devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Changhuang Liang <changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com>,
	Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>,
	Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Jack Zhu <jack.zhu@starfivetech.com>,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: phy: Add starfive,jh7110-dphy-rx
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 19:29:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <31c582a7-682a-330e-51d4-53b4a0c5f3a2@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0c94aadf-fac3-d05c-1c54-ae8337526849@starfivetech.com>

On 13/04/2023 11:02, Changhuang Liang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2023/4/13 16:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 13/04/2023 04:34, Changhuang Liang wrote:
>>>>>>> +  lane_maps:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why did this appear? Underscores are not allowed. It looks like you
>>>>>> re-implement some standard property.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Will change to lane-maps.
>>>>> Yes, according to Vinod advice, lane mapping table use device tree
>>>>> to parse makes sense.
>>>>
>>>> Hm, I have a feeling that I saw such property, so you should dig into
>>>> existing and in-flight bindings.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Krzysztof
>>>>
>>>
>>> A standard property? Like "clocks" or "resets"?
>>
>> Like lane-polarities now submitted to one MIPI.
>>
>> Anyway it does not look like a property of a board. You said it is fixed
>> per SoC, so it should be implied from the compatible. Otherwise please
>> explain in description and provide some rationale.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> 
> This property is the only one used for this IP, I have compared this IP with
> other DPHY rx module, DPHY modules form the other manufacturers not have this
> configure.
> And we also have a SoC called JH7100. It DPHY rx module is the same as JH7110.
> But we don't do the upstream work on it. If it use this lane-maps will be 
> configure as "lane_maps = /bits/ 8 <0 1 2 3 4 5>;".

And JH7100 is different SoC, so you have different compatible. Again -
is this board specific? If not, looks like SoC specific, thus imply it
from compatible.


Best regards,
Krzysztof


  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-16 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-12  8:45 [PATCH v4 0/3] Add JH7110 MIPI DPHY RX support Changhuang Liang
2023-04-12  8:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: phy: Add starfive,jh7110-dphy-rx Changhuang Liang
2023-04-12 11:34   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-12 12:42     ` Changhuang Liang
2023-04-12 16:55       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-13  1:29         ` Changhuang Liang
2023-04-13  2:34         ` Changhuang Liang
2023-04-13  8:41           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2023-04-13  9:02             ` Changhuang Liang
2023-04-16 17:29               ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2023-04-17  3:37                 ` Changhuang Liang
2023-05-04  1:21                 ` Changhuang Liang
2023-04-18 18:42             ` Rob Herring
2023-04-18 18:46               ` Rob Herring
2023-04-19  6:10                 ` Changhuang Liang
2023-04-12  8:45 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] phy: starfive: Add mipi dphy rx support Changhuang Liang
2023-04-12  8:45 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] riscv: dts: starfive: Add dphy rx node Changhuang Liang
2023-05-22 13:00 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Add JH7110 MIPI DPHY RX support Changhuang Liang
2023-05-22 13:11   ` Conor Dooley
2023-05-23  1:02     ` Changhuang Liang
2023-05-23  5:13       ` Conor Dooley
2023-05-23  5:54         ` Changhuang Liang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=31c582a7-682a-330e-51d4-53b4a0c5f3a2@linaro.org \
    --to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=changhuang.liang@starfivetech.com \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jack.zhu@starfivetech.com \
    --cc=kernel@esmil.dk \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).