Re: [RESEND 01/11] irqchip: ls-extirq: Add LS1043A, LS1088A external interrupt

[Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>]

On 2020-10-26 08:01, Biwen Li wrote:
> From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com>
> 
> Add an new IRQ chip declaration for LS1043A and LS1088A
> - compatible "fsl,ls1043a-extirq" for LS1043A, LS1046A
> - compatible "fsl,ls1088a-extirq" for LS1088A, LS208xA, LX216xA

Three things:
- This commit message doesn't describe the bit_reverse change
- Please add a cover letter
- Sending the same series again after 4 days is not OK, specially when
   the initial one was during the merge window.

Thanks,

         M.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Biwen Li <biwen.li@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c 
> b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c
> index 4d1179fed77c..564e6de0bd8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ls-extirq.c
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +// Copyright 2019-2020 NXP
> 
>  #define pr_fmt(fmt) "irq-ls-extirq: " fmt
> 
> @@ -183,6 +184,9 @@ ls_extirq_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct
> device_node *parent)
>  		priv->bit_reverse = (revcr != 0);
>  	}
> 
> +	if (of_device_is_compatible(node, "fsl,ls1043a-extirq"))
> +		priv->bit_reverse = true;
> +
>  	domain = irq_domain_add_hierarchy(parent_domain, 0, priv->nirq, node,
>  					  &extirq_domain_ops, priv);
>  	if (!domain)
> @@ -195,3 +199,5 @@ ls_extirq_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct
> device_node *parent)
>  }
> 
>  IRQCHIP_DECLARE(ls1021a_extirq, "fsl,ls1021a-extirq", 
> ls_extirq_of_init);
> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(ls1043a_extirq, "fsl,ls1043a-extirq", 
> ls_extirq_of_init);
> +IRQCHIP_DECLARE(ls1088a_extirq, "fsl,ls1088a-extirq", 
> ls_extirq_of_init);

-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...