From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=none Received: from gloria.sntech.de (gloria.sntech.de [185.11.138.130]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48FEE1A5; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 12:03:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [194.95.143.137] (helo=phil.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1r3ia0-0005T4-Vl; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 21:03:13 +0100 From: Heiko Stuebner To: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Arnd Bergmann , Bjorn Andersson , Geert Uytterhoeven , Konrad Dybcio , Matthias Brugger , Michal Simek , Neil Armstrong , Nishanth Menon , Olof Johansson Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: dt-bindings: add DTS Coding Style document Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 21:03:12 +0100 Message-ID: <3266223.44csPzL39Z@phil> In-Reply-To: References: <20231116181218.18886-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> <5727404.DvuYhMxLoT@phil> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Am Donnerstag, 16. November 2023, 20:51:24 CET schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski: > On 16/11/2023 20:26, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > > Hi Krzysztof, > > Am Donnerstag, 16. November 2023, 19:12:18 CET schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski: > >> Document preferred coding style for Devicetree sources (DTS and DTSI), > >> to bring consistency among all (sub)architectures and ease in reviews. > >> > >> Cc: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno > >> Cc: Arnd Bergmann > >> Cc: Bjorn Andersson > >> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven > >> Cc: Heiko Stuebner > >> Cc: Konrad Dybcio > >> Cc: Matthias Brugger > >> Cc: Michal Simek > >> Cc: Neil Armstrong > >> Cc: Nishanth Menon > >> Cc: Olof Johansson > >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > >> > > > >> +Order of Properties in Device Node > >> +---------------------------------- > >> + > >> +Following order of properties in device nodes is preferred: > >> + > >> +1. compatible > >> +2. reg > >> +3. ranges > >> +4. All properties with values > >> +5. Boolean properties > > > > I guess the only thing I do have questions about is the part > > > >> +4. All properties with values > >> +5. Boolean properties > > > > Is there a rationale for it? Because with it things like regulator-* > > properties then end up in two different blocks. > > Good point. It is only a matter of style that this: > > foo { > compatible = "foo"; > reg = <0x1>; > clocks = <&clk>; > wakeup-source; > key-autorepeat; > } > > looks better to me than: > > > foo { > compatible = "foo"; > reg = <0x1>; > key-autorepeat; > wakeup-source; > clocks = <&clk>; > } > > But you have good point that similar properties should be usually > grouped together. > > About which regulator properties are you thinking now? You mean the > supplies or the provider? I was thinking about the provider. There are regulator-min-microvolt = <>; and friends, but also regulator-boot-on; I guess I would just go with 1. compatible 2. reg 3. ranges 4. All other properties 5. status (if applicable) 6. Child nodes aka grouping the old 4+5 together. The difference is probably minimal but doesn't create corner cases and you don't need to know if a property has a value or is boolean when looking for it. Heiko