From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: r8a73a4: Move pfc node to work around probe ordering bug
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:53:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3282348.ooqjOMyZ9x@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdUmftjWD=hZVYVOGJWBc6tb1h=ZnMv61_nCROkOC=e_iw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Geert,
On Tuesday 10 February 2015 11:19:39 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > * Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> [150209 09:17]:
> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> >>> * Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> [150206 12:26]:
> >>>> Notes:
> >>>> - It seems several people tried to solve this in the core OF probing
> >>>> code before, but the final solution never went in?
> >>>>
> >>>> - This can be reproduced on other SoCs (e.g. sh73a0 and r8a7740) by
> >>>> moving their pfc nodes before their interrupt controller nodes.
> >>>>
> >>>> - This patch is against my working tree, so it doesn't apply to
> >>>> Simon's repository, but you get the idea....
> >>>
> >>> No issues with the patch, but here are few comments on the core
> >>> reasons (without looking at the code in this case) that might help
> >>> fix similar issues.
> >>>
> >>> In all the cases I've seen these errors are caused by non-standard
> >>> custom initcall levels for drivers like i2c bus. The real solution
> >>> is to initialize drivers later with standard module_init, and stop
> >>> the race to the bottom with custom initcall levels.
> >>>
> >>> If there is legacy board specific platofrm init code that needs
> >>> i2c gpios early, that code can probably be moved to initialize
> >>> later on.
> >>
> >> In this case no i2c is involved. The drivers for both pinctrl
> >> (renesas,pfc-r8a73a4) and irqchip (renesas,irqc) are registered
> >>
> >> at the same level:
> >> - postcore_initcall(sh_pfc_init);
> >> - postcore_initcall(irqc_init);
> >>
> >> Hence the system uses the "natural" order from within the DTS,
> >> and decided to instantiate the pfc before the irqchip.
> >
> > OK
>
> I tried converting the renesas,irqc driver to IRQCHIP_DECLARE().
> This solves the probe ordering problem, but it no longer allows the use of
> a platform device.
One (quite hackish) possible way around this is to register the platform
driver (using a static variable to ensure the driver isn't registered multiple
times) in the IRQCHIP_DECLARE'd init function, and then call
of_platform_device_create() to create the platform device. This should get the
device probed immediately.
> As I was already adding clock and runtime PM support
> (which use platform devices), IRQCHIP_DECLARE doesn't look like the
> right road to follow...
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-10 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-06 20:22 [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: r8a73a4: Move pfc node to work around probe ordering bug Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-02-09 16:24 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-09 17:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-02-09 18:29 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-02-10 10:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-02-10 18:53 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3282348.ooqjOMyZ9x@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).