From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add compatibility for TEE support
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 16:38:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32b5b04b-c644-43d0-b190-4200f0e92979@foss.st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240130175112.GA2040002-robh@kernel.org>
Hello Rob,
On 1/30/24 18:51, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:04:31AM +0100, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
>> The "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee" compatible is utilized in a system configuration
>> where the Cortex-M4 firmware is loaded by the Trusted execution Environment
>> (TEE).
>> For instance, this compatible is used in both the Linux and OP-TEE
>> device-tree:
>> - In OP-TEE, a node is defined in the device tree with the
>> st,stm32mp1-m4-tee to support signed remoteproc firmware.
>> Based on DT properties, OP-TEE authenticates, loads, starts, and stops
>> the firmware.
>> - On Linux, when the compatibility is set, the Cortex-M resets should not
>> be declared in the device tree.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
>> ---
>> V1 to V2 updates
>> - update "st,stm32mp1-m4" compatible description to generalize
>> - remove the 'reset-names' requirement in one conditional branch, as the
>> property is already part of the condition test.
>> ---
>> .../bindings/remoteproc/st,stm32-rproc.yaml | 52 +++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st,stm32-rproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st,stm32-rproc.yaml
>> index 370af61d8f28..6af821b15736 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st,stm32-rproc.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/st,stm32-rproc.yaml
>> @@ -16,7 +16,12 @@ maintainers:
>>
>> properties:
>> compatible:
>> - const: st,stm32mp1-m4
>> + enum:
>> + - st,stm32mp1-m4
>> + - st,stm32mp1-m4-tee
>> + description:
>> + Use "st,stm32mp1-m4" for the Cortex-M4 coprocessor management by non-secure context
>> + Use "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee" for the Cortex-M4 coprocessor management by secure context
>>
>> reg:
>> description:
>> @@ -142,21 +147,40 @@ properties:
>> required:
>> - compatible
>> - reg
>> - - resets
>>
>> allOf:
>> - if:
>> properties:
>> - reset-names:
>> - not:
>> - contains:
>> - const: hold_boot
>> + compatible:
>> + contains:
>> + const: st,stm32mp1-m4
>> + then:
>> + if:
>> + properties:
>> + reset-names:
>> + not:
>> + contains:
>> + const: hold_boot
>
> Note that this is true when 'reset-names' is not present. If that is not
> desired, then you need 'required: [reset-names]'. Not really a new issue
> though.
>
Yes that corresponds to my expectation, for compatibility with legacy DT.
If the hold_boot reset was not used, reset-names was not mandatory
I will add the 'required: [reset-names]' in the else
Thanks,
Arnaud
>> + then:
>> + required:
>> + - st,syscfg-holdboot
>> + - resets
>> + else:
>> + properties:
>> + st,syscfg-holdboot: false
>> + required:
>> + - resets
>
> 'resets' is always required within the outer 'then' schema, so you can
> move this up a level.
>
>> +
>> + - if:
>> + properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + contains:
>> + const: st,stm32mp1-m4-tee
>> then:
>> - required:
>> - - st,syscfg-holdboot
>> - else:
>> properties:
>> st,syscfg-holdboot: false
>> + reset-names: false
>> + resets: false
>>
>> additionalProperties: false
>>
>> @@ -188,5 +212,15 @@ examples:
>> st,syscfg-rsc-tbl = <&tamp 0x144 0xFFFFFFFF>;
>> st,syscfg-m4-state = <&tamp 0x148 0xFFFFFFFF>;
>> };
>> + - |
>> + #include <dt-bindings/reset/stm32mp1-resets.h>
>> + m4@10000000 {
>> + compatible = "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee";
>> + reg = <0x10000000 0x40000>,
>> + <0x30000000 0x40000>,
>> + <0x38000000 0x10000>;
>> + st,syscfg-rsc-tbl = <&tamp 0x144 0xFFFFFFFF>;
>> + st,syscfg-m4-state = <&tamp 0x148 0xFFFFFFFF>;
>> + };
>>
>> ...
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-13 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-18 10:04 [PATCH v2 0/4] Introduction of a remoteproc tee to load signed firmware Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-01-18 10:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] remoteproc: Add TEE support Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-01-25 18:55 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-01-26 13:39 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-01-26 16:04 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-01-26 18:03 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-01-29 18:55 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-01-30 8:15 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-01-18 10:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add compatibility for " Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-01-26 11:03 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-01-26 13:59 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-01-30 17:21 ` Rob Herring
2024-01-30 17:51 ` Rob Herring
2024-02-13 15:38 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN [this message]
2024-01-18 10:04 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] remoteproc: stm32: Create sub-functions to request shutdown and release Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-01-18 10:04 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-01-26 17:11 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-01-30 9:13 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-01-31 18:52 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-02-01 15:06 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-02-01 16:02 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-02-01 18:33 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-02-02 19:53 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-02-05 9:13 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-02-13 15:47 ` [Linux-stm32] " Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-02-13 18:39 ` Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=32b5b04b-c644-43d0-b190-4200f0e92979@foss.st.com \
--to=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).