From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E12C34AB0A; Thu, 16 Oct 2025 15:31:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760628695; cv=none; b=VBHeUj9Fas6aoXRGeHp9Ddond4E0NndKFvXsCTfyHzkQyPz89bWUwOvudow9Gu4TnRDGELhh7SipQAkkWEE8N5gSdFpMolFGV7zp6GHrOR9AksRPz97Co/Y19XhHi7P1Jeo322U8iRNRA1HZmMF1hNO8s04a2xux1h8wbstbaQA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760628695; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Qce3400gZekkF9rZ7Sx7daMfcQ3FsP9u8CUhUxXknVk=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=SQ2qw2R3eBIo79vMA/YGRq2gPYi6MknpfAnKZIWFpQlbm4XgKje1yssG3Ica264Y2AZFx5u5Vhq6Its/1xU89tx36paXcoK5A3jSE6QxBgo7VqTgg1GtdjoMGucQcnG8TlRwDaVyMHr5OMwRNfcxZ8D5RfXeHrrGOru1eSh7NPU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=mYvWAMzc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="mYvWAMzc" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72522C4CEFE; Thu, 16 Oct 2025 15:31:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1760628694; bh=Qce3400gZekkF9rZ7Sx7daMfcQ3FsP9u8CUhUxXknVk=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=mYvWAMzc3SRt0amHGvhycjblwqyjJ6zdnMVaKS5Vug3+gevsdIzHaZLXjsH/W+9ZF YnWZ+0fNbLouN2ioX8xOA0rgLJG9lqT30DfZNiPNhucWWagL451Ii7Th3oA8o0iyOi Dd7zd+m4hdcSJOCU/WndaJS0Xwmcx3J37qbODzL4lL47Fk9AJS8VfAsfAzcgjyPr1g /UFuieoKW1bMC6Tp/AvmTH+Cr01y31pGfh2XnwXFXrXAD5eG1xCOdxY6kPeA2pDa7c 3cP27mjB5L+6vKqafZSlDxW6idRtqSC9QuX3KILRH7wh+jWyLcYxtp6VQFJBIzVZ1W gc58BAIZlHfmw== Message-ID: <33513b43-f6d1-4c76-887b-39611a75e1f4@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 16:31:28 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: qcom: camss: Enable setting the rate to camnoc_rt_axi clock To: Loic Poulain Cc: Konrad Dybcio , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Hangxiang Ma , Robert Foss , Andi Shyti , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Todor Tomov , Vladimir Zapolskiy , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org References: <20251014-add-new-clock-in-vfe-matching-list-v1-1-0d965ccc8a3a@oss.qualcomm.com> <9984bc23-05ef-4d46-aeb8-feb0a18e5762@kernel.org> From: Bryan O'Donoghue Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 16/10/2025 13:22, Loic Poulain wrote: >> I'm - perhaps naively - assuming this clock really is required ... and >> that both will be needed concurrently. > AFAIU, the NRT clock is not in use for the capture part, and only > required for the offline processing engine (IPE, OPE), which will > likely be described as a separated node. Maybe yeah though we already have bindings. @Hangxiang I thought we had discussed this clock was required for your setup. Can you confirm with a test and then 1. Repost with my RB - I assume you included this on purpose 2. Respond that you can live without it. --- bod