From: Chanwoo Choi <chanwoo@kernel.org>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de,
Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: use consistent name for private data struct
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 01:06:46 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3352fa1a-185b-34d6-078a-6ebb7fb60cc1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230704093242.583575-4-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
On 23. 7. 4. 18:32, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> The variable name for the private data struct is 'info' in some
> functions and 'data' in others. Both names do not give a clue what
> type the variable has, so consistently use 'dfi'.
>
> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c | 72 ++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c b/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> index 467f9f42d38f7..e19e5acaa362c 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> @@ -59,13 +59,13 @@ struct rockchip_dfi {
>
> static void rockchip_dfi_start_hardware_counter(struct devfreq_event_dev *edev)
> {
> - struct rockchip_dfi *info = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
> - void __iomem *dfi_regs = info->regs;
> + struct rockchip_dfi *dfi = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
> + void __iomem *dfi_regs = dfi->regs;
> u32 val;
> u32 ddr_type;
>
> /* get ddr type */
> - regmap_read(info->regmap_pmu, RK3399_PMUGRF_OS_REG2, &val);
> + regmap_read(dfi->regmap_pmu, RK3399_PMUGRF_OS_REG2, &val);
> ddr_type = (val >> RK3399_PMUGRF_DDRTYPE_SHIFT) &
> RK3399_PMUGRF_DDRTYPE_MASK;
>
> @@ -84,28 +84,28 @@ static void rockchip_dfi_start_hardware_counter(struct devfreq_event_dev *edev)
>
> static void rockchip_dfi_stop_hardware_counter(struct devfreq_event_dev *edev)
> {
> - struct rockchip_dfi *info = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
> - void __iomem *dfi_regs = info->regs;
> + struct rockchip_dfi *dfi = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
> + void __iomem *dfi_regs = dfi->regs;
>
> writel_relaxed(SOFTWARE_DIS, dfi_regs + DDRMON_CTRL);
> }
>
> static int rockchip_dfi_get_busier_ch(struct devfreq_event_dev *edev)
> {
> - struct rockchip_dfi *info = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
> + struct rockchip_dfi *dfi = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
> u32 tmp, max = 0;
> u32 i, busier_ch = 0;
> - void __iomem *dfi_regs = info->regs;
> + void __iomem *dfi_regs = dfi->regs;
>
> rockchip_dfi_stop_hardware_counter(edev);
>
> /* Find out which channel is busier */
> for (i = 0; i < RK3399_DMC_NUM_CH; i++) {
> - info->ch_usage[i].access = readl_relaxed(dfi_regs +
> + dfi->ch_usage[i].access = readl_relaxed(dfi_regs +
> DDRMON_CH0_DFI_ACCESS_NUM + i * 20) * 4;
> - info->ch_usage[i].total = readl_relaxed(dfi_regs +
> + dfi->ch_usage[i].total = readl_relaxed(dfi_regs +
> DDRMON_CH0_COUNT_NUM + i * 20);
> - tmp = info->ch_usage[i].access;
> + tmp = dfi->ch_usage[i].access;
> if (tmp > max) {
> busier_ch = i;
> max = tmp;
> @@ -118,20 +118,20 @@ static int rockchip_dfi_get_busier_ch(struct devfreq_event_dev *edev)
>
> static int rockchip_dfi_disable(struct devfreq_event_dev *edev)
> {
> - struct rockchip_dfi *info = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
> + struct rockchip_dfi *dfi = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
>
> rockchip_dfi_stop_hardware_counter(edev);
> - clk_disable_unprepare(info->clk);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(dfi->clk);
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> static int rockchip_dfi_enable(struct devfreq_event_dev *edev)
> {
> - struct rockchip_dfi *info = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
> + struct rockchip_dfi *dfi = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
> int ret;
>
> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(info->clk);
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(dfi->clk);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&edev->dev, "failed to enable dfi clk: %d\n", ret);
> return ret;
> @@ -149,13 +149,13 @@ static int rockchip_dfi_set_event(struct devfreq_event_dev *edev)
> static int rockchip_dfi_get_event(struct devfreq_event_dev *edev,
> struct devfreq_event_data *edata)
> {
> - struct rockchip_dfi *info = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
> + struct rockchip_dfi *dfi = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
> int busier_ch;
>
> busier_ch = rockchip_dfi_get_busier_ch(edev);
>
> - edata->load_count = info->ch_usage[busier_ch].access;
> - edata->total_count = info->ch_usage[busier_ch].total;
> + edata->load_count = dfi->ch_usage[busier_ch].access;
> + edata->total_count = dfi->ch_usage[busier_ch].total;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -176,47 +176,47 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rockchip_dfi_id_match);
> static int rockchip_dfi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> - struct rockchip_dfi *data;
> + struct rockchip_dfi *dfi;
> struct devfreq_event_desc *desc;
> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node, *node;
>
> - data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct rockchip_dfi), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!data)
> + dfi = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dfi), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!dfi)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - data->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> - if (IS_ERR(data->regs))
> - return PTR_ERR(data->regs);
> + dfi->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(dfi->regs))
> + return PTR_ERR(dfi->regs);
>
> - data->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "pclk_ddr_mon");
> - if (IS_ERR(data->clk))
> - return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(data->clk),
> + dfi->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "pclk_ddr_mon");
> + if (IS_ERR(dfi->clk))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(dfi->clk),
> "Cannot get the clk pclk_ddr_mon\n");
>
> node = of_parse_phandle(np, "rockchip,pmu", 0);
> if (!node)
> return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -ENODEV, "Can't find pmu_grf registers\n");
>
> - data->regmap_pmu = syscon_node_to_regmap(node);
> + dfi->regmap_pmu = syscon_node_to_regmap(node);
> of_node_put(node);
> - if (IS_ERR(data->regmap_pmu))
> - return PTR_ERR(data->regmap_pmu);
> + if (IS_ERR(dfi->regmap_pmu))
> + return PTR_ERR(dfi->regmap_pmu);
>
> - data->dev = dev;
> + dfi->dev = dev;
>
> - desc = &data->desc;
> + desc = &dfi->desc;
> desc->ops = &rockchip_dfi_ops;
> - desc->driver_data = data;
> + desc->driver_data = dfi;
> desc->name = np->name;
>
> - data->edev = devm_devfreq_event_add_edev(&pdev->dev, desc);
> - if (IS_ERR(data->edev)) {
> + dfi->edev = devm_devfreq_event_add_edev(&pdev->dev, desc);
> + if (IS_ERR(dfi->edev)) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> "failed to add devfreq-event device\n");
> - return PTR_ERR(data->edev);
> + return PTR_ERR(dfi->edev);
> }
>
> - platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dfi);
>
> return 0;
> }
Applied it. Thanks.
--
Best Regards,
Samsung Electronics
Chanwoo Choi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-06 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-04 9:32 [PATCH v7 00/26] Add perf support to the rockchip-dfi driver Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 01/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Make pmu regmap mandatory Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:03 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 02/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Embed desc into private data struct Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:04 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 03/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: use consistent name for " Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:06 ` Chanwoo Choi [this message]
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 04/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Add SoC specific init function Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:22 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 05/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: dfi store raw values in counter struct Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:34 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 06/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Use free running counter Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 17:21 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 07/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: introduce channel mask Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 17:21 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 11:22 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-16 12:45 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17 8:28 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 08/26] PM / devfreq: rk3399_dmc,dfi: generalize DDRTYPE defines Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 17:43 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 13:10 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 09/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Clean up DDR type register defines Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 19:11 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 12:03 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17 8:34 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 10/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Add RK3568 support Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:17 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 11:34 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17 8:31 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 11/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Handle LPDDR2 correctly Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:24 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 12/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Handle LPDDR4X Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:26 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 13/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Pass private data struct to internal functions Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:28 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 14/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Prepare for multiple users Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:46 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 15/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: give variable a better name Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:37 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 16/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Add perf support Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 21:48 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 12:16 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17 8:35 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 17/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: make register stride SoC specific Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 21:57 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 18/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: account for multiple DDRMON_CTRL registers Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 22:19 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 12:49 ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17 8:35 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 19/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: add support for RK3588 Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 22:22 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 20/26] dt-bindings: devfreq: event: convert Rockchip DFI binding to yaml Sascha Hauer
2023-10-09 0:40 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 21/26] dt-bindings: devfreq: event: rockchip,dfi: Add rk3568 support Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 22:24 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 22/26] dt-bindings: devfreq: event: rockchip,dfi: Add rk3588 support Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 22:24 ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 23/26] dt-bindings: soc: rockchip: grf: add rockchip,rk3588-pmugrf Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 24/26] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3399: Enable DFI Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 25/26] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk356x: Add DFI Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04 9:32 ` [PATCH v7 26/26] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588s: " Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3352fa1a-185b-34d6-078a-6ebb7fb60cc1@kernel.org \
--to=chanwoo@kernel.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=michael.riesch@wolfvision.net \
--cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=vincent.legoll@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).