devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chanwoo Choi <chanwoo@kernel.org>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de,
	Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 03/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: use consistent name for private data struct
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2023 01:06:46 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3352fa1a-185b-34d6-078a-6ebb7fb60cc1@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230704093242.583575-4-s.hauer@pengutronix.de>

On 23. 7. 4. 18:32, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> The variable name for the private data struct is 'info' in some
> functions and 'data' in others. Both names do not give a clue what
> type the variable has, so consistently use 'dfi'.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c | 72 ++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c b/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> index 467f9f42d38f7..e19e5acaa362c 100644
> --- a/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/event/rockchip-dfi.c
> @@ -59,13 +59,13 @@ struct rockchip_dfi {
>  
>  static void rockchip_dfi_start_hardware_counter(struct devfreq_event_dev *edev)
>  {
> -	struct rockchip_dfi *info = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
> -	void __iomem *dfi_regs = info->regs;
> +	struct rockchip_dfi *dfi = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
> +	void __iomem *dfi_regs = dfi->regs;
>  	u32 val;
>  	u32 ddr_type;
>  
>  	/* get ddr type */
> -	regmap_read(info->regmap_pmu, RK3399_PMUGRF_OS_REG2, &val);
> +	regmap_read(dfi->regmap_pmu, RK3399_PMUGRF_OS_REG2, &val);
>  	ddr_type = (val >> RK3399_PMUGRF_DDRTYPE_SHIFT) &
>  		    RK3399_PMUGRF_DDRTYPE_MASK;
>  
> @@ -84,28 +84,28 @@ static void rockchip_dfi_start_hardware_counter(struct devfreq_event_dev *edev)
>  
>  static void rockchip_dfi_stop_hardware_counter(struct devfreq_event_dev *edev)
>  {
> -	struct rockchip_dfi *info = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
> -	void __iomem *dfi_regs = info->regs;
> +	struct rockchip_dfi *dfi = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
> +	void __iomem *dfi_regs = dfi->regs;
>  
>  	writel_relaxed(SOFTWARE_DIS, dfi_regs + DDRMON_CTRL);
>  }
>  
>  static int rockchip_dfi_get_busier_ch(struct devfreq_event_dev *edev)
>  {
> -	struct rockchip_dfi *info = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
> +	struct rockchip_dfi *dfi = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
>  	u32 tmp, max = 0;
>  	u32 i, busier_ch = 0;
> -	void __iomem *dfi_regs = info->regs;
> +	void __iomem *dfi_regs = dfi->regs;
>  
>  	rockchip_dfi_stop_hardware_counter(edev);
>  
>  	/* Find out which channel is busier */
>  	for (i = 0; i < RK3399_DMC_NUM_CH; i++) {
> -		info->ch_usage[i].access = readl_relaxed(dfi_regs +
> +		dfi->ch_usage[i].access = readl_relaxed(dfi_regs +
>  				DDRMON_CH0_DFI_ACCESS_NUM + i * 20) * 4;
> -		info->ch_usage[i].total = readl_relaxed(dfi_regs +
> +		dfi->ch_usage[i].total = readl_relaxed(dfi_regs +
>  				DDRMON_CH0_COUNT_NUM + i * 20);
> -		tmp = info->ch_usage[i].access;
> +		tmp = dfi->ch_usage[i].access;
>  		if (tmp > max) {
>  			busier_ch = i;
>  			max = tmp;
> @@ -118,20 +118,20 @@ static int rockchip_dfi_get_busier_ch(struct devfreq_event_dev *edev)
>  
>  static int rockchip_dfi_disable(struct devfreq_event_dev *edev)
>  {
> -	struct rockchip_dfi *info = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
> +	struct rockchip_dfi *dfi = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
>  
>  	rockchip_dfi_stop_hardware_counter(edev);
> -	clk_disable_unprepare(info->clk);
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(dfi->clk);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int rockchip_dfi_enable(struct devfreq_event_dev *edev)
>  {
> -	struct rockchip_dfi *info = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
> +	struct rockchip_dfi *dfi = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	ret = clk_prepare_enable(info->clk);
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(dfi->clk);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(&edev->dev, "failed to enable dfi clk: %d\n", ret);
>  		return ret;
> @@ -149,13 +149,13 @@ static int rockchip_dfi_set_event(struct devfreq_event_dev *edev)
>  static int rockchip_dfi_get_event(struct devfreq_event_dev *edev,
>  				  struct devfreq_event_data *edata)
>  {
> -	struct rockchip_dfi *info = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
> +	struct rockchip_dfi *dfi = devfreq_event_get_drvdata(edev);
>  	int busier_ch;
>  
>  	busier_ch = rockchip_dfi_get_busier_ch(edev);
>  
> -	edata->load_count = info->ch_usage[busier_ch].access;
> -	edata->total_count = info->ch_usage[busier_ch].total;
> +	edata->load_count = dfi->ch_usage[busier_ch].access;
> +	edata->total_count = dfi->ch_usage[busier_ch].total;
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -176,47 +176,47 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, rockchip_dfi_id_match);
>  static int rockchip_dfi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> -	struct rockchip_dfi *data;
> +	struct rockchip_dfi *dfi;
>  	struct devfreq_event_desc *desc;
>  	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node, *node;
>  
> -	data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct rockchip_dfi), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!data)
> +	dfi = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dfi), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!dfi)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	data->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> -	if (IS_ERR(data->regs))
> -		return PTR_ERR(data->regs);
> +	dfi->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> +	if (IS_ERR(dfi->regs))
> +		return PTR_ERR(dfi->regs);
>  
> -	data->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "pclk_ddr_mon");
> -	if (IS_ERR(data->clk))
> -		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(data->clk),
> +	dfi->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "pclk_ddr_mon");
> +	if (IS_ERR(dfi->clk))
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(dfi->clk),
>  				     "Cannot get the clk pclk_ddr_mon\n");
>  
>  	node = of_parse_phandle(np, "rockchip,pmu", 0);
>  	if (!node)
>  		return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -ENODEV, "Can't find pmu_grf registers\n");
>  
> -	data->regmap_pmu = syscon_node_to_regmap(node);
> +	dfi->regmap_pmu = syscon_node_to_regmap(node);
>  	of_node_put(node);
> -	if (IS_ERR(data->regmap_pmu))
> -		return PTR_ERR(data->regmap_pmu);
> +	if (IS_ERR(dfi->regmap_pmu))
> +		return PTR_ERR(dfi->regmap_pmu);
>  
> -	data->dev = dev;
> +	dfi->dev = dev;
>  
> -	desc = &data->desc;
> +	desc = &dfi->desc;
>  	desc->ops = &rockchip_dfi_ops;
> -	desc->driver_data = data;
> +	desc->driver_data = dfi;
>  	desc->name = np->name;
>  
> -	data->edev = devm_devfreq_event_add_edev(&pdev->dev, desc);
> -	if (IS_ERR(data->edev)) {
> +	dfi->edev = devm_devfreq_event_add_edev(&pdev->dev, desc);
> +	if (IS_ERR(dfi->edev)) {
>  		dev_err(&pdev->dev,
>  			"failed to add devfreq-event device\n");
> -		return PTR_ERR(data->edev);
> +		return PTR_ERR(dfi->edev);
>  	}
>  
> -	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dfi);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }

Applied it. Thanks.

-- 
Best Regards,
Samsung Electronics
Chanwoo Choi


  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-06 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-04  9:32 [PATCH v7 00/26] Add perf support to the rockchip-dfi driver Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 01/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Make pmu regmap mandatory Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:03   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 02/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Embed desc into private data struct Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:04   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 03/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: use consistent name for " Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:06   ` Chanwoo Choi [this message]
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 04/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Add SoC specific init function Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:22   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 05/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: dfi store raw values in counter struct Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 16:34   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 06/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Use free running counter Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 17:21   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 07/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: introduce channel mask Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 17:21   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 11:22     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-16 12:45       ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17  8:28         ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 08/26] PM / devfreq: rk3399_dmc,dfi: generalize DDRTYPE defines Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 17:43   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 13:10     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 09/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Clean up DDR type register defines Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 19:11   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 12:03     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17  8:34       ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 10/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Add RK3568 support Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:17   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 11:34     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17  8:31       ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 11/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Handle LPDDR2 correctly Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:24   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 12/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Handle LPDDR4X Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:26   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 13/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Pass private data struct to internal functions Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:28   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 14/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Prepare for multiple users Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:46   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 15/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: give variable a better name Sascha Hauer
2023-10-06 18:37   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 16/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: Add perf support Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 21:48   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 12:16     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17  8:35       ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 17/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: make register stride SoC specific Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 21:57   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 18/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: account for multiple DDRMON_CTRL registers Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 22:19   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-10-16 12:49     ` Sascha Hauer
2023-10-17  8:35       ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 19/26] PM / devfreq: rockchip-dfi: add support for RK3588 Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 22:22   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 20/26] dt-bindings: devfreq: event: convert Rockchip DFI binding to yaml Sascha Hauer
2023-10-09  0:40   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 21/26] dt-bindings: devfreq: event: rockchip,dfi: Add rk3568 support Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 22:24   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 22/26] dt-bindings: devfreq: event: rockchip,dfi: Add rk3588 support Sascha Hauer
2023-10-08 22:24   ` Chanwoo Choi
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 23/26] dt-bindings: soc: rockchip: grf: add rockchip,rk3588-pmugrf Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 24/26] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3399: Enable DFI Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 25/26] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk356x: Add DFI Sascha Hauer
2023-07-04  9:32 ` [PATCH v7 26/26] arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588s: " Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3352fa1a-185b-34d6-078a-6ebb7fb60cc1@kernel.org \
    --to=chanwoo@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=michael.riesch@wolfvision.net \
    --cc=myungjoo.ham@samsung.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
    --cc=vincent.legoll@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).