From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] dt: Document sata_rcar bindings Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 15:30:54 +0100 Message-ID: <3353398.KxY2PdxubL@avalon> References: <1383912570-8393-1-git-send-email-valentine.barshak@cogentembedded.com> <1383912570-8393-3-git-send-email-valentine.barshak@cogentembedded.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kumar Gala Cc: Valentine Barshak , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Simon Horman , Magnus Damm , Kuninori Morimoto , Guennadi Liakhovetski , Tejun Heo , Vladimir Barinov , Sergei Shtylyov , Mark Rutland List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Kumar, On Friday 08 November 2013 08:26:47 Kumar Gala wrote: > On Nov 8, 2013, at 6:09 AM, Valentine Barshak wrote: > > These bindings can be used to register SATA devices found on R-Car SoC. > > > > Signed-off-by: Valentine Barshak > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/sata_rcar.txt | 18 +++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/sata_rcar.txt > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/sata_rcar.txt > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/sata_rcar.txt new file mode > > 100644 > > index 0000000..1e61113 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/sata_rcar.txt > > @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ > > +* Renesas R-Car SATA > > + > > +Required properties: > > +- compatible : should contain one of the following: > > + - "renesas,sata-r8a7779" for R-Car H1 > > + - "renesas,sata-r8a7790" for R-Car H2 > > + - "renesas,sata-r8a7791" for R-Car M2 > > +- reg : address and length of the SATA registers; > > +- interrupts : must consist of one interrupt specifier. > > + > > +Example: > > + > > +sata: sata@fc600000 { > > + compatible = "renesas,sata-r8a7779"; > > + reg = <0xfc600000 0x2000>; > > + interrupt-parent = <&gic>; > > + interrupts = <0 100 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > > Sorry, I missed the discussion on this, but I think it would be better in > the example to leave this as 4. There is no reference in the binding at > all to figure out where IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH is defined. Then I'd rather reference the interrupts binding document, otherwise people will blindly write device tree sources with 4 instead of IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH, which I don't want to encourage. > > +}; -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart