devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: "robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org"
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	"conor+dt@kernel.org" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Iskander Amara <iskander.amara@theobroma-systems.com>
Cc: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rockchip: add missing definition of pmu io domains 1 and 2 on ringneck
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 14:09:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3388688.6M6d0yLqnL@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR04MB6013A6A65AF95BB80067E601D6752@VI1PR04MB6013.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Iskander,

Am Montag, 22. Januar 2024, 13:17:50 CET schrieb Iskander Amara:
> Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,
> Is there any feedback about the patch below that you would like to share?

no feedback, change looks good.

I was mainly waiting for the merge-window to close, so that
I can get a nice 6.8-rc1 as base :-)

Heiko

> ________________________________
> From: Iskander Amara <iskander.amara@theobroma-systems.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 3, 2024 5:47 PM
> To: robh+dt@kernel.org <robh+dt@kernel.org>; krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>; conor+dt@kernel.org <conor+dt@kernel.org>; heiko@sntech.de <heiko@sntech.de>; devicetree@vger.kernel.org <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>; linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com>; Iskander Amara <iskander.amara@theobroma-systems.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rockchip: add missing definition of pmu io domains 1 and 2 on ringneck
> 
> Two pmuio domains on ringneck are not defined:
>         1- PMUIO1: supplied by vcc_3v3 regulator(PMIC RK809)
>         2- PMUIO2: supplied by vcc_3v3 regulator(PMIC RK809)
> 
> The reason why no functional effect was observed is because of that
> the above mentionned PMUIO domains were supplied by a regulator
> which is always on.
> 
> So let's add their definition in the dtsi.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Iskander Amara <iskander.amara@theobroma-systems.com>
> ---
> v2:
>         - Fix indentation
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-ringneck.dtsi | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-ringneck.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-ringneck.dtsi
> index 12397755830b..bb1aea82e666 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-ringneck.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/px30-ringneck.dtsi
> @@ -347,6 +347,12 @@ pmic_int: pmic-int {
>          };
>  };
> 
> +&pmu_io_domains {
> +       pmuio1-supply = <&vcc_3v3>;
> +       pmuio2-supply = <&vcc_3v3>;
> +       status = "okay";
> +};
> +
>  &saradc {
>          vref-supply = <&vcc_1v8>;
>          status = "okay";
> --
> 2.34.1
> 
> 





  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-22 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-03 16:47 [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: rockchip: add missing definition of pmu io domains 1 and 2 on ringneck Iskander Amara
     [not found] ` <VI1PR04MB6013A6A65AF95BB80067E601D6752@VI1PR04MB6013.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
2024-01-22 13:09   ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2024-01-25 21:12 ` Heiko Stuebner
2024-01-26  9:21   ` Iskander Amara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3388688.6M6d0yLqnL@diego \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=iskander.amara@theobroma-systems.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=quentin.schulz@theobroma-systems.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).