From: "Clément Leger" <cleger@kalray.eu>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, od <od@zcrc.me>,
linux-remoteproc <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] remoteproc: Add device-managed variants of rproc_alloc/rproc_add
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 11:46:12 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <340758118.96812669.1576493172804.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191210164014.50739-2-paul@crapouillou.net>
Hi Paul,
I tested it on our driver and freeing/remove are called correctly on probe error and on module removal.
Tested-By: Clement Leger <cleger@kalray.eu>
Regards,
Clément
----- On 10 Dec, 2019, at 17:40, Paul Cercueil paul@crapouillou.net wrote:
> Add API functions devm_rproc_alloc() and devm_rproc_add(), which behave
> like rproc_alloc() and rproc_add() respectively, but register their
> respective cleanup function to be called on driver detach.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> v3: New patch
> v4: No change
>
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/remoteproc.h | 5 +++
> 2 files changed, 72 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 307df98347ba..0a9fc7fdd1c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -1932,6 +1932,33 @@ int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_add);
>
> +static void devm_rproc_remove(void *rproc)
> +{
> + rproc_del(rproc);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * devm_rproc_add() - resource managed rproc_add()
> + * @dev: the underlying device
> + * @rproc: the remote processor handle to register
> + *
> + * This function performs like rproc_add() but the registered rproc device will
> + * automatically be removed on driver detach.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success and an appropriate error code otherwise.
> + */
> +int devm_rproc_add(struct device *dev, struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + err = rproc_add(rproc);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, devm_rproc_remove, rproc);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(devm_rproc_add);
> +
> /**
> * rproc_type_release() - release a remote processor instance
> * @dev: the rproc's device
> @@ -2149,6 +2176,46 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_del);
>
> +static void devm_rproc_free(struct device *dev, void *res)
> +{
> + rproc_free(*(struct rproc **)res);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * devm_rproc_alloc() - resource managed rproc_alloc()
> + * @dev: the underlying device
> + * @name: name of this remote processor
> + * @ops: platform-specific handlers (mainly start/stop)
> + * @firmware: name of firmware file to load, can be NULL
> + * @len: length of private data needed by the rproc driver (in bytes)
> + *
> + * This function performs like rproc_alloc() but the acuired rproc device will
> + * automatically be released on driver detach.
> + *
> + * On success the new rproc is returned, and on failure, NULL.
> + */
> +struct rproc *devm_rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> + const struct rproc_ops *ops,
> + const char *firmware, int len)
> +{
> + struct rproc **ptr, *rproc;
> +
> + ptr = devres_alloc(devm_rproc_free, sizeof(*ptr), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ptr)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + rproc = rproc_alloc(dev, name, ops, firmware, len);
> + if (rproc) {
> + *ptr = rproc;
> + devres_add(dev, ptr);
> + } else {
> + devres_free(ptr);
> + }
> +
> + return rproc;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(devm_rproc_alloc);
> +
> /**
> * rproc_add_subdev() - add a subdevice to a remoteproc
> * @rproc: rproc handle to add the subdevice to
> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> index 16ad66683ad0..5f201f0c86c3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> @@ -595,6 +595,11 @@ int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc);
> int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc);
> void rproc_free(struct rproc *rproc);
>
> +struct rproc *devm_rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> + const struct rproc_ops *ops,
> + const char *firmware, int len);
> +int devm_rproc_add(struct device *dev, struct rproc *rproc);
> +
> void rproc_add_carveout(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_mem_entry *mem);
>
> struct rproc_mem_entry *
> --
> 2.24.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-16 10:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-10 16:40 [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: Document JZ47xx VPU auxiliary processor Paul Cercueil
2019-12-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] remoteproc: Add device-managed variants of rproc_alloc/rproc_add Paul Cercueil
2019-12-12 9:43 ` Fabien DESSENNE
2019-12-14 22:27 ` Paul Cercueil
2020-01-20 19:45 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-12-16 10:46 ` Clément Leger [this message]
2019-12-16 13:41 ` Paul Cercueil
2020-01-20 20:07 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-12-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] remoteproc: Add prepare/unprepare callbacks Paul Cercueil
2019-12-12 10:03 ` Fabien DESSENNE
2019-12-14 22:30 ` Paul Cercueil
2019-12-16 8:42 ` Clément Leger
2019-12-16 16:16 ` Clément Leger
2019-12-17 10:21 ` Fabien DESSENNE
2019-12-21 20:20 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-01-15 21:15 ` Paul Cercueil
2020-01-20 20:19 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-01-21 10:24 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2019-12-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] remoteproc: ingenic: Added remoteproc driver Paul Cercueil
2019-12-10 16:40 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] MAINTAINERS: Add myself as reviewer for Ingenic rproc driver Paul Cercueil
2019-12-13 19:02 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: Document JZ47xx VPU auxiliary processor Rob Herring
2019-12-13 21:27 ` Paul Cercueil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=340758118.96812669.1576493172804.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu \
--to=cleger@kalray.eu \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=od@zcrc.me \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=paul@crapouillou.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).