Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Microchip IPC remoteproc

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 01/12/2025 17:04, Valentina.FernandezAlanis@microchip.com wrote:
> On 25/11/2025 09:46, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 02:21:56PM +0000, Valentina Fernandez wrote:
>>> Microchip family of RISC-V SoCs typically have one or more application
>>> clusters. These clusters can be configured to run in an Asymmetric
>>> Multi Processing (AMP) mode.
>>>
>>> Add a dt-binding for these application clusters.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Valentina Fernandez <valentina.fernandezalanis@microchip.com>
>>> ---
>>>   .../microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc.yaml         | 95 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 95 insertions(+)
>>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..348902f9a202
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: Microchip IPC Remote Processor
>>> +
>>> +description:
>>> +  Microchip family of RISC-V SoCs typically have one or more
>>> +  clusters. These clusters can be configured to run in an Asymmetric
>>> +  Multi Processing (AMP) mode where clusters are split in independent
>>> +  software contexts.
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> +  - Valentina Fernandez <valentina.fernandezalanis@microchip.com>
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    const: microchip,ipc-sbi-remoteproc
>> This should be SoC specific compatible.
> There was some discussion on this in v1: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241015-distrust-chatty-9e723e670fef@spud/


I don't find anything from that explained in commit msg or device
description, so next time you send you will get exactly the same comment.

Best regards,
Krzysztof