From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] gpio: pcf857x: Add OF support Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 01:44:50 +0200 Message-ID: <35333449.0R3QP6op66@avalon> References: <1377590559-14279-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> <7583101.2yAsZLOucV@avalon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Tomasz Figa , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Wolfram Sang , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Tomasz Figa , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Grant Likely , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Archit Taneja , Sylwester Nawrocki , Linux-OMAP , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Linus, On Thursday 29 August 2013 20:24:32 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Tuesday 27 August 2013 19:18:55 Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> > The driver should support the same chip models reardless of whether > >> > it's used with or without DT. If an entry in the OF table has no > >> > corresponding entry in the I2C table I would consider that as a driver > >> > bug. > >> > >> Linus Walleij posted a patch to support DT only probing, but too many > >> side-effects showed up. Some were fixable (probe regressions) and some > >> need more work, if feasible at all. Most prominent is that runtime > >> instantiation of i2c slaves currently needs an entry in the i2c table. > > > > Linus, I'd like to get this in v3.12 if it's not too late. Could you > > please provide your input ? > > Provided some input on the v4 version, Do you mean v4 of this patch ? I can't find your reply. > due to being a bit overloaded my patch queue is overloaded... No worries. We can delay this one until v3.13. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart