From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] irqchip: gic: Support hierarchy irq domain. Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 11:27:01 +0200 Message-ID: <3536113.xYztHpGTJM@wuerfel> References: <1412864980-20273-1-git-send-email-yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com> <1412864980-20273-4-git-send-email-yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com> <543B93B4.3040404@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <543B93B4.3040404@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Marc Zyngier , "Joe.C" , Thomas Gleixner , Jiang Liu , Mark Rutland , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Sricharan R , Florian Fainelli , Russell King , "yingjoe.chen@gmail.com" , "yh.chen@mediatek.com" , "arm@kernel.org" , "nathan.chung@mediatek.com" , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Jason Cooper , Pawel Moll , Matt Porter , Marc Carino , Rob Herring , Matthias Brugger e List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Monday 13 October 2014 09:56:20 Marc Zyngier wrote: > if (irq_domain_is_hierarchy(domain)) { > + if (domain->ops->xlate) { > + /* > + * If we've already configured this interrupt, > + * don't do it again, or hell will break loose. > + */ > + if (domain->ops->xlate(domain, irq_data->np, > + irq_data->args, > + irq_data->args_count, > + &hwirq, &type)) > + return 0; > + > + virq = irq_find_mapping(domain, hwirq); > + if (virq) > + return virq; > + } > virq = irq_domain_alloc_irqs(domain, 1, NUMA_NO_NODE, irq_data); > return virq <= 0 ? 0 : virq; > } > > Thoughts? Using irq_find_mapping() first is probably the right approach, that is what irq_create_mapping() does too, and I suppose we want those to be symmetric. mt_sysirq_domain_alloc() in patch 4 has the irq_find_domain check in it, which I guess we can remove when it has moved to the common code. I don't see irq_domain_alloc_irqs() in linux-next or older kernels, where does that get introduced? Arnd