Re: [PATCH V2 1/6] dt-bindings: usb: usbmisc-imx: convert to DT schema

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 14/10/2022 05:51, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> Convert usbmisc-imx to DT schema format.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/usb/fsl,usbmisc.yaml  | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../devicetree/bindings/usb/usbmisc-imx.txt   | 18 -------
>  2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/fsl,usbmisc.yaml
>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usbmisc-imx.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/fsl,usbmisc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/fsl,usbmisc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c83ffb6729b5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/fsl,usbmisc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/usb/fsl,usbmisc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Freescale i.MX non-core registers

You sent v2 before we finished this topic. Is it correct? Even if TXT
had such title, let's don't keep the wrong name.

If it is non-core registers, why it is in USB? Why it is an usb-misc device?

> +
> +maintainers:
> +  - Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@nxp.com>
> +

Best regards,
Krzysztof