Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-m4f: Add K3 AM64x SoCs

[Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>]

On 4/25/24 12:15 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 03:36:39PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 14:06:09 -0500, Andrew Davis wrote:
>>> From: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@ti.com>
>>>
>>> K3 AM64x SoC has a Cortex M4F subsystem in the MCU voltage domain.
>>> The remote processor's life cycle management and IPC mechanisms are
>>> similar across the R5F and M4F cores from remote processor driver
>>> point of view. However, there are subtle differences in image loading
>>> and starting the M4F subsystems.
>>>
>>> The YAML binding document provides the various node properties to be
>>> configured by the consumers of the M4F subsystem.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@collabora.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@ti.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>>   .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-m4f-rproc.yaml  | 126 ++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 126 insertions(+)
>>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-m4f-rproc.yaml
>>>
>>
>> My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:
>>
>> yamllint warnings/errors:
>>
>> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
>>
>>
>> doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
>> Warning: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-m4f-rproc.yaml references a file that doesn't exist: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.yaml
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-m4f-rproc.yaml: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.yaml
> 
> The file is now in dt-schema:
> https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/blob/main/dtschema/schemas/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.yaml

So should I use "reserved-memory/reserved-memory.yaml" here, or just
drop this line completely?

Andrew