From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: at91: use chipid device for soc detection Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:30:29 +0200 Message-ID: <3656574.4DhkCSPNfU@wuerfel> References: <55618572.U3p4crGV1Y@wuerfel> <1459260638-3899-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1459260638-3899-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Nicolas Ferre , Ludovic Desroches , Alexandre Belloni , Boris BREZILLON , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 29 March 2016 16:10:38 Nicolas Ferre wrote: > From: Ludovic Desroches > > So far, the CIDR and EXID registers were in the DBGU interface. This device > has disappeared with the SAMA5D2 family. These registers are exposed > through a new device called chipid. > > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches > [nicolas.ferre@atmel.com: remove useless warnings] > Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni > Acked-by: Rob Herring > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre > [arnd@arndb.de: suggest to use static functions to reduce scope] > (whole series) Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann