From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 5/5] Documentation: power: reset: Add documentation for generic SYSCON reboot driver Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 16:08:47 +0100 Message-ID: <3683633.QqePEXQehq@wuerfel> References: <1390504801-24483-1-git-send-email-fkan@apm.com> <20140124182355.GF4758@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <52E2F450.2070100@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <52E2F450.2070100-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org Cc: Marc C , Mark Rutland , Feng Kan , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Friday 24 January 2014 15:16:32 Marc C wrote: > > > What's wrong with having a system clock unit binding, that the kernel > > can decompose as appropriate? > > From what I understand, the arm-soc maintainers want to reduce (and perhaps even > eliminate) these board-specific constructs, and try to utilize common driver-code that > resides in the "driver" folder. I can vouch for the syscon/regmap framework as something > which would enable the effort. While your statement is true in general, it doesn't seem to counter what Mark R said above. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html