From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gabriel Fernandez Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] STM32F4 Add RTC & QSPI clocks Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 09:52:54 +0200 Message-ID: <36f11be6-0706-6fdb-681c-5d11d5989e28@st.com> References: <1476436699-21879-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <20161018235108.GP8871@codeaurora.org> <20161019202904.GB8871@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20161019202904.GB8871@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Michael Turquette , Nicolas Pitre , Arnd Bergmann , daniel.thompson@linaro.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, ludovic.barre@st.com, olivier.bideau@st.com, amelie.delaunay@st.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Stephen, On 10/19/2016 10:29 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 10/19, Gabriel Fernandez wrote: >> Hi Stephen, >> >> >> On 10/19/2016 01:51 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> On 10/14, gabriel.fernandez@st.com wrote: >>>> Gabriel Fernandez (6): >>>> clk: stm32f4: Add LSI & LSE clocks >>>> ARM: dts: stm32f429: add LSI and LSE clocks >>>> arm: stmf32: Enable SYSCON >>>> clk: stm32f4: Add RTC clock >>>> clk: stm32f469: Add QSPI clock >>>> ARM: dts: stm32f429: Add QSPI clock >>> Can the clk patches be picked without causing problems for >>> existing dt changes? Do you want an ack from clk maintainers >>> instead of us picking the clk patches up? The series has >>> intermingled clk and dts changes so I'm confused. >>> >> Thanks for reviewing. >> >> Normally DT patches will be taken by STM32 maintainer, but yes there >> is a dependency between patch 1 & 2, so if you push the patch 1 into >> clk-next tree you have to take also patch 2. > Let's break the dependency by making the required property > optional or key off a different compatible string. As it stands > right now applying patch 1 will cause things to break until the > second patch lands which is not great. > >> You have to be synchronized with Alexandre Torgue. >> >> > I'd prefer zero synchronization. Please just send the clk patches > the next time and leave the stuff for arm-soc out of the patch > series. Thanks. Ok Many Thanks.