Re: [PATCH tty-next v2 4/4] Documentation: devicetree: add bindings documentation for bcm63xx-uart

Mark Rutland
2014-02-21T13:49:46Z

On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 12:49:05PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Two more comments:
>
> On Thursday 20 February 2014 10:15:54 Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > +- clock-names: should contain "periph" for the functional clock
>
> I think we should really start standardizing on the clock names more.
> We don't have any uart that calls its functional clock "periph" so
> far.
>
> How about naming it "fclk" or "uart"?
>
> I'd actually prefer making it an anonymous clock, but I know that
> will just trigger comments about what might happen if it turns
> out we need more than one clock for a future version of this device.

Yup ;)

I'm happy as long as we have a well-defined name for each clock input,
regardless of what those particular names might be.

Mark.