From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A989C001B0 for ; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 12:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232525AbjFXMbG (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jun 2023 08:31:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53546 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230388AbjFXMbF (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jun 2023 08:31:05 -0400 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [IPv6:2607:fcd0:100:8a00::2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7958E5D; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 05:31:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1687609858; bh=mVIJR4nMBjtez2qGjfCXvDgWZNOR+zXfVhJPIUl/Iv4=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=VVs3b+cKfTVsbQ04tkLwm1dwlaFoywd9QVlDOQ1Mla3JQSx0THZQB/I2qZV/kngZg rxfUENf2roXtZmUFsEr2WrVwlyHCnHN3m7LJLwq12W/3Q8K2xLawib0u9p3y81jMGz zPyD5W3t7sI49wOt6Bn86Soufm1TNXZ+2yrqwMso= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E95E12862C2; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 08:30:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bedivere.hansenpartnership.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id JMB_OKpXtfZI; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 08:30:58 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=hansenpartnership.com; s=20151216; t=1687609858; bh=mVIJR4nMBjtez2qGjfCXvDgWZNOR+zXfVhJPIUl/Iv4=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=VVs3b+cKfTVsbQ04tkLwm1dwlaFoywd9QVlDOQ1Mla3JQSx0THZQB/I2qZV/kngZg rxfUENf2roXtZmUFsEr2WrVwlyHCnHN3m7LJLwq12W/3Q8K2xLawib0u9p3y81jMGz zPyD5W3t7sI49wOt6Bn86Soufm1TNXZ+2yrqwMso= Received: from [IPv6:2601:5c4:4302:c21::a774] (unknown [IPv6:2601:5c4:4302:c21::a774]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by bedivere.hansenpartnership.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F39711286268; Sat, 24 Jun 2023 08:30:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <38e69be8524c85062e627f77ed7ad766905e60a3.camel@HansenPartnership.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] scsi: dt-bindings: ufs: qcom: Fix warning for sdm845 by adding reg-names From: James Bottomley To: Luca Weiss , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Abel Vesa , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , "Martin K . Petersen" , Alim Akhtar , Avri Altman , Bart Van Assche Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 08:30:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: References: <20230623113009.2512206-1-abel.vesa@linaro.org> <20230623113009.2512206-6-abel.vesa@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2023-06-23 at 14:38 +0200, Luca Weiss wrote: > With my private mailbox I just have a different folder for patches > that have been sent which I archive once they're applied, but with > work GMail I don't see how I can easily replicate this since it's > also not grouping threads properly. I have something similar, but instead of multiple folders, I use imap labels to achieve the same thing (and then evolution search folders to sort out the labels). I believe GMail has some primitive labelling system that actually works (unlike exchange), so you might be able to get a scheme like that to work. For my mobile phone, which doesn't have the sophisticated search folders evolution does, I use dovecot virtual folders to achieve the same effect. I'm afraid I don't think GMail has any equivalent of this. James