* Re: [linux-next:master 9473/11093] arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:624.26-675.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pcie@ff500000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "fe000000"
[not found] <202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com>
@ 2025-05-16 20:10 ` Heiko Stübner
2025-05-18 10:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Stübner @ 2025-05-16 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Finley Xiao, kernel test robot, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, devicetree, linux-rockchip
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, Kever Yang
Am Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2025, 16:04:20 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb kernel test robot:
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> head: bdd609656ff5573db9ba1d26496a528bdd297cf2
> commit: ceb6ef1ea9002669afc0e1ef258e530d3c05d91a [9473/11093] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add RK3562 evb2 devicetree
> config: arm64-randconfig-2052-20250513 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250515/202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 21.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f819f46284f2a79790038e1f6649172789734ae8)
> dtschema version: 2025.3.dev27+g32749b3
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250515/202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com/
>
> dtcheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:624.26-675.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pcie@ff500000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "fe000000"
> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:1115.20-1181.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pinctrl: missing or empty reg/ranges property
hmm, I don't really understand this error message.
From a practical point, the dtschema-version I have installed is
2025.3.dev27+g32749b3, which is the topmost commit from
may-13th.
Running the dtbscheck on the rk3562-evb-v10.dtb on the full
linux-next from today, yields no errors.
Checking out the specific commit ceb6ef1ea90026 brings up the
errors from below [1], because they come from different trees.
But in no cases does dtbscheck complain about the PCI memory regions.
The PCIe controller in question of course has 3 memory regions
reg = <0x0 0xfe000000 0x0 0x400000>,
<0x0 0xff500000 0x0 0x10000>,
<0x0 0xfc000000 0x0 0x100000>;
reg-names = "dbi", "apb", "config";
and currently the node-name mimics the "apb" memory region.
Should it always use the first one?
[1]
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562-evb2-v10.dtb: /soc/power-management@ff258000/power-controller: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['rockchip,rk3562-power-controller']
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562-evb2-v10.dtb: pcie@ff500000 (rockchip,rk3562-pcie): interrupt-names:5: 'dma0' was expected
> from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.yaml#
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562-evb2-v10.dtb: pcie@ff500000 (rockchip,rk3562-pcie): compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
> ['rockchip,rk3562-pcie', 'rockchip,rk3568-pcie'] is too long
> 'rockchip,rk3568-pcie' was expected
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-next:master 9473/11093] arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:624.26-675.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pcie@ff500000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "fe000000"
2025-05-16 20:10 ` [linux-next:master 9473/11093] arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:624.26-675.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pcie@ff500000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "fe000000" Heiko Stübner
@ 2025-05-18 10:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-05-18 13:57 ` Heiko Stübner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2025-05-18 10:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiko Stübner, Finley Xiao, kernel test robot, Rob Herring,
Krzysztof Kozlowski, Conor Dooley, devicetree, linux-rockchip
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, Kever Yang
On 16/05/2025 22:10, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2025, 16:04:20 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb kernel test robot:
>> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
>> head: bdd609656ff5573db9ba1d26496a528bdd297cf2
>> commit: ceb6ef1ea9002669afc0e1ef258e530d3c05d91a [9473/11093] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add RK3562 evb2 devicetree
>> config: arm64-randconfig-2052-20250513 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250515/202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com/config)
>> compiler: clang version 21.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f819f46284f2a79790038e1f6649172789734ae8)
>> dtschema version: 2025.3.dev27+g32749b3
>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250515/202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>>
>> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
>> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
>> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com/
>>
>> dtcheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:624.26-675.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pcie@ff500000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "fe000000"
>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:1115.20-1181.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pinctrl: missing or empty reg/ranges property
>
> hmm, I don't really understand this error message.
>
> From a practical point, the dtschema-version I have installed is
> 2025.3.dev27+g32749b3, which is the topmost commit from
> may-13th.
>
> Running the dtbscheck on the rk3562-evb-v10.dtb on the full
> linux-next from today, yields no errors.
These are standard dtc warnings.
>
> Checking out the specific commit ceb6ef1ea90026 brings up the
> errors from below [1], because they come from different trees.
>
>
> But in no cases does dtbscheck complain about the PCI memory regions.
>
>
> The PCIe controller in question of course has 3 memory regions
> reg = <0x0 0xfe000000 0x0 0x400000>,
> <0x0 0xff500000 0x0 0x10000>,
> <0x0 0xfc000000 0x0 0x100000>;
> reg-names = "dbi", "apb", "config";
>
> and currently the node-name mimics the "apb" memory region.
> Should it always use the first one?
I don't understand where is the problem. The warning tells you: unit
address is not correct. Fix the unit address to match reg.
About second warning: that's also kind of already existing issue and
fixed in multiple places. Don't put non-MMIO nodes in simple-bus, like
soc, because it is not correct. simple-bus is for MMIO nodes.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-next:master 9473/11093] arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:624.26-675.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pcie@ff500000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "fe000000"
2025-05-18 10:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2025-05-18 13:57 ` Heiko Stübner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Heiko Stübner @ 2025-05-18 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Finley Xiao, kernel test robot, Rob Herring, Krzysztof Kozlowski,
Conor Dooley, devicetree, linux-rockchip, Krzysztof Kozlowski
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, Kever Yang
Am Sonntag, 18. Mai 2025, 12:36:50 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 16/05/2025 22:10, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2025, 16:04:20 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb kernel test robot:
> >> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> >> head: bdd609656ff5573db9ba1d26496a528bdd297cf2
> >> commit: ceb6ef1ea9002669afc0e1ef258e530d3c05d91a [9473/11093] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add RK3562 evb2 devicetree
> >> config: arm64-randconfig-2052-20250513 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250515/202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com/config)
> >> compiler: clang version 21.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f819f46284f2a79790038e1f6649172789734ae8)
> >> dtschema version: 2025.3.dev27+g32749b3
> >> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250515/202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> >>
> >> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> >> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> >> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com/
> >>
> >> dtcheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> >>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:624.26-675.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pcie@ff500000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "fe000000"
> >>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:1115.20-1181.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pinctrl: missing or empty reg/ranges property
> >
> > hmm, I don't really understand this error message.
> >
> > From a practical point, the dtschema-version I have installed is
> > 2025.3.dev27+g32749b3, which is the topmost commit from
> > may-13th.
> >
> > Running the dtbscheck on the rk3562-evb-v10.dtb on the full
> > linux-next from today, yields no errors.
>
> These are standard dtc warnings.
>
> >
> > Checking out the specific commit ceb6ef1ea90026 brings up the
> > errors from below [1], because they come from different trees.
> >
> >
> > But in no cases does dtbscheck complain about the PCI memory regions.
> >
> >
> > The PCIe controller in question of course has 3 memory regions
> > reg = <0x0 0xfe000000 0x0 0x400000>,
> > <0x0 0xff500000 0x0 0x10000>,
> > <0x0 0xfc000000 0x0 0x100000>;
> > reg-names = "dbi", "apb", "config";
> >
> > and currently the node-name mimics the "apb" memory region.
> > Should it always use the first one?
>
> I don't understand where is the problem. The warning tells you: unit
> address is not correct. Fix the unit address to match reg.
The problem was more on "is my toolchain outdated or why am I not seeing
these reports". Which I now managed to resolve, because I finally saw the
"(this is a W=1 build)" in the header of the reporting mail ;-)
So yes, with the dtschema warning about the power-controller I got my mind
stuck in the "is my dtschema" outdated, not realizing that the first one
comes from dtc itself and then also missing the "(this is a W=1 build)"
mention.
Heiko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-05-18 13:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com>
2025-05-16 20:10 ` [linux-next:master 9473/11093] arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:624.26-675.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pcie@ff500000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "fe000000" Heiko Stübner
2025-05-18 10:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-05-18 13:57 ` Heiko Stübner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox