From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gloria.sntech.de (gloria.sntech.de [185.11.138.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E0B022C356; Fri, 16 May 2025 20:10:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747426215; cv=none; b=LFEVrwGALzL5UWPwsct6SNfpIM0iv9SVziNkg9Qe8JJyy19dwOyJkMxIQtUKZWym5TuUBdcRd8VtTHAoKKOk6JKEAYxoCqZhBH+jw3b9tRgWhppkSn2DQ+ASHpH+vz3qbq+fjTTT+YTeV86NNx9NBesyKwV7l1gBOWIVK7HkgRM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747426215; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2e/6iUxTrx5nSFpVgyz1b/DK7YLQxC4kUUQt9HxsL/A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BNfmHtYb05T7YnWY4iiBElM+piTZ5cVIgXAc/J5h8UnCS4RrUXs9EwoXEUPAHpPIGrpElljsf4mv5o53PsPP5OXQN80imkUilyJSCzKFo4yAAY3xwHXukOWnmJeoiJkb9qbZHoNquf/mCIafm0GQwLzJ9yq7Q0QDh8PnMKy3Fc8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b=2uDmcFx2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.11.138.130 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sntech.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sntech.de header.i=@sntech.de header.b="2uDmcFx2" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sntech.de; s=gloria202408; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=4GWgmLyTl8Gk7HWPKH3auqn15uG60IPCLLC27zlld+U=; b=2uDmcFx2iH0atwEuyZslnoA/0e BBye0RDnqTqbtAf/uz2jOx/Sp3HaZw+uRLNPW0iyEdjqf5pxj1qDrr86wmaKkAFyePPnhwYeDjoOt J549FxwSNA8sb49hmXVkgFBiIwJwFiPozl4XJiJwW/Ys2beQgjsALDx5kB9v9er8o6Zk6hMcHGzN2 jcBZ50uwE/375RfFcHFie5E/vOWoCsz1qTkacLLRB0JiAtkqxGKVMRdriEFQSdyu+Wg1RDmYhgyvK 2Zq7dnAXP6iFICbdX2060oMBO2qXfRM2rrY2JsfGsDghYFZKQ3M+74/zlMQAEn1xJv/Edlob9B3NS ZkdUb5Ww==; Received: from i53875a50.versanet.de ([83.135.90.80] helo=diego.localnet) by gloria.sntech.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uG1Nc-0007aP-NQ; Fri, 16 May 2025 22:10:04 +0200 From: Heiko =?UTF-8?B?U3TDvGJuZXI=?= To: Finley Xiao , kernel test robot , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Kever Yang Subject: Re: [linux-next:master 9473/11093] arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:624.26-675.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc/pcie@ff500000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "fe000000" Date: Fri, 16 May 2025 22:10:03 +0200 Message-ID: <3983362.fW5hKsROvD@diego> In-Reply-To: <202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com> References: <202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Am Donnerstag, 15. Mai 2025, 16:04:20 Mitteleurop=C3=A4ische Sommerzeit sch= rieb kernel test robot: > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.g= it master > head: bdd609656ff5573db9ba1d26496a528bdd297cf2 > commit: ceb6ef1ea9002669afc0e1ef258e530d3c05d91a [9473/11093] arm64: dts:= rockchip: Add RK3562 evb2 devicetree > config: arm64-randconfig-2052-20250513 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/a= rchive/20250515/202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com/config) > compiler: clang version 21.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f= 819f46284f2a79790038e1f6649172789734ae8) > dtschema version: 2025.3.dev27+g32749b3 > reproduce (this is a W=3D1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archi= ve/20250515/202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) >=20 > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new vers= ion of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505150745.PQT9TLYX-lkp= @intel.com/ >=20 > dtcheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) > >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:624.26-675.5: Warning (simple= _bus_reg): /soc/pcie@ff500000: simple-bus unit address format error, expect= ed "fe000000" > >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562.dtsi:1115.20-1181.5: Warning (simp= le_bus_reg): /soc/pinctrl: missing or empty reg/ranges property hmm, I don't really understand this error message. =46rom a practical point, the dtschema-version I have installed is 2025.3.dev27+g32749b3, which is the topmost commit from may-13th. Running the dtbscheck on the rk3562-evb-v10.dtb on the full linux-next from today, yields no errors. Checking out the specific commit ceb6ef1ea90026 brings up the errors from below [1], because they come from different trees. But in no cases does dtbscheck complain about the PCI memory regions. The PCIe controller in question of course has 3 memory regions reg =3D <0x0 0xfe000000 0x0 0x400000>, <0x0 0xff500000 0x0 0x10000>, <0x0 0xfc000000 0x0 0x100000>; reg-names =3D "dbi", "apb", "config"; and currently the node-name mimics the "apb" memory region. Should it always use the first one? [1] > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562-evb2-v10.dtb: /soc/power-managemen= t@ff258000/power-controller: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['= rockchip,rk3562-power-controller'] > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562-evb2-v10.dtb: pcie@ff500000 (rockc= hip,rk3562-pcie): interrupt-names:5: 'dma0' was expected > from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pci/rockchip-dw-pcie.y= aml# > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3562-evb2-v10.dtb: pcie@ff500000 (rockc= hip,rk3562-pcie): compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: > ['rockchip,rk3562-pcie', 'rockchip,rk3568-pcie'] is too long > 'rockchip,rk3568-pcie' was expected >=20