From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Alexander Stein <alexanders83@web.de>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Linus Walleij (linus.walleij@linaro.org)"
<linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (pinctrl && !CONFIG_OF)
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 10:37:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3990550.tEk9cGVQPW@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2044946.aGLaEK2W6I@ws-stein>
On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 9:00:47 AM CEST Alexander Stein wrote:
> On Monday 27 June 2016 23:36:29, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday, June 27, 2016 11:15:25 AM CEST Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > On 06/26/16 23:39, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > > Changes since 20160624:
> > > on i386, when CONFIG_OF is not enabled ...
> > > but OF_GPIO is enabled due to this in drivers/gpio/Kconfig:
> > >
> > > config OF_GPIO
> > >
> > > def_bool y
> > > depends on OF || COMPILE_TEST
> > >
> > > (above from commit 1e4a80640338924b9f9fd7a121ac31d08134410a
> > > from Alexander Stein <alexanders83@web.de>)
> > >
> > >
> > > ../drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-iproc-gpio.c:381:20: error:
> > > 'pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_pin' undeclared here (not in a function)
> > > ../drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-cygnus-mux.c:739:20: error:
> > > 'pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_group' undeclared here (not in a
> > > function) ../drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c:365:20: error:
> > > 'pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_pin' undeclared here (not in a function)
> > >
> > > because that function is only present when CONFIG_OF is enabled.
> > >
> > >
> > > Also, why does that commit (1e4a80640338924b9f9fd7a121ac31d08134410a)
> > > not have any other S-O-B lines in it? like whoever merged it?
> >
> > (adding Linus Walleij and Alexander Stein to Cc)
> >
> > Unfortunately, the changelog also doesn't say what triggered that
> > change. I guess there was a driver that did 'select OF_GPIO'
> > and had a dependency on COMPILE_TEST, though I don't see any
> > driver doing that in linux-next.
>
> It was the first change of the changes done in my branch
> https://github.com/AlexanderStein/linux/tree/gpio-compile-test
> in order to compile test as much gpio drivers as possible. Yet, pinctrl
> drivers were out of my scope.
I see
> > I think the commit should just be reverted, it clearly breaks
> > stuff, and whatever needs it can be fixed in a better way.
>
> Why not depend PINCTRL_IPROC_GPIO on CONFIG_OF as Randy stated
> pinconf_generic_dt_node_to_map_pin and friends are only present if CONFIG_OF
> is enabled. Depending on OF_GPIO only is enough under the assumption a) you
> made below.
> Also what about providing dummy implementation for those missing function in
> case CONFIG_OF is disabled, my preference as more code can be compile tested.
>
> > Specifically, we have three ways that the OF_GPIO symbol
> > is used:
> >
> > a) it is implicitly enabled when both GPIOLIB and OF are turned on
>
> or if COMPILE_TEST is enabled
>
> I think a problem in this and possibly other cases is that COMPILE_TEST
> loosens the Kconfig dependencies to some degree. How to proceed? Allow compile
> testing drivers only if some optional settings are enabled?
I think we can start by reverting your patch: for compile-testing we can
always enable CONFIG_OF these days, which will also turn on OF_GPIO.
Compile-testing drivers that need OF_GPIO while OF is disabled makes
no sense to me, it's not a configuration that anybody can ever use
and it adds no build coverage.
I think we should also drop all 'select OF_GPIO' statements, AFAICT
we have just proven that they are all redundant because they would
have otherwise broken things. This should be a separate cleanup patch.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-28 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20160627163939.20e454d5@canb.auug.org.au>
2016-06-27 18:15 ` linux-next: Tree for Jun 27 (pinctrl && !CONFIG_OF) Randy Dunlap
2016-06-27 21:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-28 7:00 ` Alexander Stein
2016-06-28 8:25 ` Randy Dunlap
2016-06-28 8:37 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-06-29 5:54 ` Alexander Stein
2016-07-04 9:46 ` Linus Walleij
2016-07-04 16:12 ` Randy Dunlap
2016-07-05 6:48 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3990550.tEk9cGVQPW@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=alexanders83@web.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox