From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D00C2D0A8 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC2A208E4 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 16:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="Eoh6ys5d" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726516AbgIWQLP (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2020 12:11:15 -0400 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:51590 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726360AbgIWQLP (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2020 12:11:15 -0400 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 08NGB6qP051092; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 11:11:06 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1600877466; bh=GonlYZbi6nuWCM6HFFiNjrh40RYQxuq7I3I6tTMPXms=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Eoh6ys5dXwvuJvbIN04O27uh7DZWwPb2H8oPjiRhmreX2i+4ABzWABg7rt3z/OGOR JJgEp2xIRmRXs53+AfleyyaJBhI3koLG2P1kKdC5VtBJMKwZC0j4wYOwjg9vbYHS99 oEJgWPPioiUTIAIjCky8EZ+2r5wsmkfv/UFEHiww= Received: from DLEE102.ent.ti.com (dlee102.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.32]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 08NGB6rE040430 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 23 Sep 2020 11:11:06 -0500 Received: from DLEE111.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.22) by DLEE102.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 11:11:06 -0500 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DLEE111.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 11:11:06 -0500 Received: from [10.250.36.88] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 08NGB5ix061623; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 11:11:05 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] dt-bindings: tas2770: Remove ti,asi-format property To: Mark Brown CC: , , , , , References: <20200923132600.10652-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <20200923132600.10652-4-dmurphy@ti.com> <20200923155145.GD5707@sirena.org.uk> From: Dan Murphy Message-ID: <39d966c4-2f56-c004-4e7c-24a99b07cc72@ti.com> Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 11:11:05 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200923155145.GD5707@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Mark On 9/23/20 10:51 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 08:25:58AM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote: >> Remove the property ti,asi-format as the driver only reads this property >> and performs no action against it. > We should probably leave the property as documented and move it to > deprecated rather than delete the documentation entirely. I mulled this over to just deprecate the property and I know removing these ABIs are not highly accepted. But the support code for it was incomplete and if a user had it populated in the DT and we removed the support then there will be no functional change. This property was supposed to set the RX edge SBCLK detection but this is done based on the dai format. So removing the property will have no affect on the users. Dan