Re: [PATCH 3/5] spi: dt-bindings: renesas,rzv2h-rspi: Document RZ/G3E SoC support

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 04/03/2026 16:34, Biju Das wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof Kozlowski,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
>> Sent: 04 March 2026 15:06
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] spi: dt-bindings: renesas,rzv2h-rspi: Document RZ/G3E SoC support
>>
>> On 18/02/2026 08:50, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 05:23:47PM +0100, Tommaso Merciai wrote:
>>>> Document the RSPI controller on the Renesas RZ/G3E SoC. The block is
>>>> compatible with the RSPI implementation found on the RZ/V2H(P) family.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tommaso Merciai <tommaso.merciai.xr@bp.renesas.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  - This patch depend up on [0]
>>>>  - [0]
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260128215132.1353381-2-cosmin-gabriel.t
>>>> anislav.xa@renesas.com/
>>>
>>> I am not even looking there, start reviewing each other patches, so
>>> you won't be sending FIXES instead of reviews.
>>
>> You kind of ignored the problem and the other patch got merged.
> 
> We prepared a patch updating the description and it is under internal review:

That's not the point. The point was that you give PUBLIC review that
mentioned patch is incomplete and must be changed.

Not prepare a follow-up patch. That's exactly my complain I raised, so
you solved nothing.

> 
> This will cover any combinations.
> 
>   description:
>       Must contain unique references to DMA specifiers, with at least one
>       for transmission and one for reception. Each category may include
>       multiple entries, constrained only by the total number of DMACs
>       available on the SoC.

No. Solves nothing. Renesas folks were supposed to review patches
instead of letting poor code be merged to THEN develop fixes.


Best regards,
Krzysztof