Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] soc: c3: Add support for power domains controller

[Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>]

Hi Kevin,
      Thanks for your reply.

On 2023/7/27 06:40, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
> 
> Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com> writes:
> 
>> Add support for C3 Power controller. C3 power control
>> registers are in secure domain, and should be accessed by SMC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xianwei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>
>> ---
>> V1 -> V2: Fixed some formatting.
>> ---
>>   drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-secure-pwrc.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-secure-pwrc.c b/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-secure-pwrc.c
>> index c11d65a3e3d9..a1ffebf70de3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-secure-pwrc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-secure-pwrc.c
>> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>   #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
>>   #include <dt-bindings/power/meson-a1-power.h>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/power/amlogic,c3-pwrc.h>
>>   #include <dt-bindings/power/meson-s4-power.h>
>>   #include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
>>   #include <linux/firmware/meson/meson_sm.h>
>> @@ -120,6 +121,22 @@ static struct meson_secure_pwrc_domain_desc a1_pwrc_domains[] = {
>>        SEC_PD(RSA,     0),
>>   };
>>
>> +static struct meson_secure_pwrc_domain_desc c3_pwrc_domains[] = {
>> +     SEC_PD(C3_NNA,  0),
>> +     SEC_PD(C3_AUDIO,        GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>> +     SEC_PD(C3_SDIOA,        GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>> +     SEC_PD(C3_EMMC, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>> +     SEC_PD(C3_USB_COMB, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>> +     SEC_PD(C3_SDCARD,       GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>> +     SEC_PD(C3_ETH,  GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>> +     SEC_PD(C3_GE2D, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>> +     SEC_PD(C3_CVE,  GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>> +     SEC_PD(C3_GDC_WRAP,     GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>> +     SEC_PD(C3_ISP_TOP,              GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>> +     SEC_PD(C3_MIPI_ISP_WRAP, GENPD_FLAG_ALWAYS_ON),
>> +     SEC_PD(C3_VCODEC,       0),
>> +};
> 
> All of these domains being hard-coded to ALWAYS_ON looks suspicious, and
> can also be an indicator that the drivers for these domains are not
> (properly) using runtime PM, or not connected to the correct domains the DT.
> 
> Similar to the tables for s4 and a1 in this same file, please describe
> the reason that each of these domains needs to be hard coded to be
> always on.
Will do.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Kevin