From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B76C433DB for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 09:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC24E61964 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 09:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231786AbhC2JyO (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 05:54:14 -0400 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.123]:27945 "EHLO esa.microchip.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232272AbhC2JyD (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Mar 2021 05:54:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1617011642; x=1648547642; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iqjkFOT92R42EBV1+ip/OTCYxN2E0rr9W21GWrOPJW8=; b=GN6EXJuBnRT5xkUI2jK5E8432C/OKFPzsBvnUro8n16vcZOzeQMshlAi 8Wn01WJWSNAFifCFXuInZYHlzwzx9rDPLSZkscGCjqPK0bQd2H/OzLG7y 2Tozbmz9IHY95RZyFUZikiUf2G3P3wY1fu54qJ2n/X+alwhj0V8weCGqu aIWHiVao8dLVP6piKrJ0T5Hl4aGKjwTCqsN9/Mfra1PJH013O36fMJchp vIRK+t09xKVTLXqOyFAmJapY3SPB6gZxLM5XqM4hEm997feeL5T13wKYG oX1yMZ1w7CcAmGdKlrFlC10Z8YRGwjOUW3bE48Dec935DB0h1CI6mp8/N Q==; IronPort-SDR: EoF2F1D8H+Crm52uj2dRiGS01WnW/ncbQQVWt6qQT27wItBj0vseQ0vbtuiTw1HcZ6Pn2hGTru iUtw7exDg2R7F3tDpNlJriU97PK7EHrqQRw0QrmWDQq1jfxGwBeDi0E3oQaJV3/eW2oinR+ZFn /5LK4W8KScUGTywyXB/OIzdqA7WDtPGA/YeEkbS9YtsL1c8EZPsXrmcVITXgvPxqgIhWirHajI fQbFxj46KE1jpa+qZlgTdbZ+SQ2AlTlGCzNodS6iBzysEdjXoTxavzN24SZYTBJyX70DUiH+Cc kzU= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,287,1610434800"; d="scan'208";a="108891101" Received: from smtpout.microchip.com (HELO email.microchip.com) ([198.175.253.82]) by esa4.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 29 Mar 2021 02:54:02 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 02:54:02 -0700 Received: from [10.171.246.61] (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex01.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.2176.2 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 29 Mar 2021 02:54:00 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Microship SAMA5D4 VPU support et al To: Emil Velikov , Alexandre Belloni CC: Ezequiel Garcia , devicetree , Rob Herring , "Ludovic Desroches" , Philipp Zabel , , linux-rockchip References: <20210311154055.3496076-1-emil.l.velikov@gmail.com> <5ecf1d3b8a8f88d6387a1549faeb4f4180cf5d4b.camel@collabora.com> <50b3b4b3-6c5b-3f1e-3499-c88574ce9f74@microchip.com> From: Nicolas Ferre Organization: microchip Message-ID: <3aeb1924-d461-ab8b-440b-81f33a1a8213@microchip.com> Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 11:53:59 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 25/03/2021 at 15:22, Emil Velikov wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > Greetings all, > > On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 08:48, Alexandre Belloni > wrote: >> >> On 24/03/2021 14:44:14+0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >>> Now, when we have the tag from Rob, how to coordinate these different >>> pieces? Will it go through the media git tree? Will we benefit from a stable >>> branch to share or will we just have to wait for the driver to hit Mainline >>> before adding the defconfig and DT patches? >>> > Thanks for the Acked-by Nicolas. > >> >> I think the defconfig and dt patches can go through at91 as soon as we >> get Rob's ack. There is no build dependency so it can be taken at any >> time. Worst case, we end up with a selected config option that doesn't >> exist. >> > My personal preference is to merge everything in one go. > I believe it will be easier from maintainer's point of view, plus odds > of conflicts with the AT91 tree are close to zero. > > Then again, as long as the maintainers are happy - I'm fine either way. I'm taking defconfig 2 last patches of your series right now. No need to include them in subsequent versions. For DT, I'm waiting for settlement on refined code. As indicated by Alexandre, changes will need to travel through arm-soc tree so we'll coordinate when patches are ready. Thanks a lot! Best regards, Nicolas -- Nicolas Ferre