public inbox for devicetree@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@baylibre.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jic23@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	lars@metafoo.de, michael.hennerich@analog.com,
	gstols@baylibre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] iio: adc: ad7606: add support for AD7606C-{16,18} parts
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 10:33:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c4edf41-fd3b-4258-9b9e-a81b25568403@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240819064721.91494-8-aardelean@baylibre.com>

On 8/19/24 1:47 AM, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> The AD7606C-16 and AD7606C-18 are pretty similar with the AD7606B.
> The main difference between AD7606C-16 & AD7606C-18 is the precision in
> bits (16 vs 18).
> Because of that, some scales need to be defined for the 18-bit variants, as
> they need to be computed against 2**18 (vs 2**16 for the 16 bit-variants).
> 
> Because the AD7606C-16,18 also supports bipolar & differential channels,
> for SW-mode, the default range of 10 V or ±10V should be set at probe.
> On reset, the default range (in the registers) is set to value 0x3 which
> corresponds to '±10 V single-ended range', regardless of bipolar or
> differential configuration.
> 
> Aside from the scale/ranges, the AD7606C-16 is similar to the AD7606B.
> 
> And the AD7606C-18 variant offers 18-bit precision. The unfortunate effect
> of this 18-bit sample size, is that there is no simple/neat way to get the
> samples into a 32-bit array without having to do a home-brewed bit-buffer.
> The ADC must read all samples (from all 8 channels) in order to get the
> N-th sample (this could be reworked to do up-to-N-th sample for scan-direct).
> There doesn't seem to be any quick-trick to be usable to pad the samples
> up to at least 24 bits.
> Even the optional status-header is 8-bits, which would mean 26-bits of data
> per sample.
> That means that when using a simple SPI controller (which can usually read
> 8 bit multiples) a simple bit-buffer trick is required.
> 
Maybe it would be better to just use .bits_per_word = 18 for the 18-bit
ADC and not worry about "simple" SPI controller support for that one?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-08-19 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-19  6:47 [PATCH 0/7] iio: adc: ad7606: add support for AD7606C-{16,18} parts Alexandru Ardelean
2024-08-19  6:47 ` [PATCH 1/7] iio: adc: ad7606: add 'bits' parameter to channels macros Alexandru Ardelean
2024-08-23 18:52   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-27 13:53     ` Alexandru Ardelean
2024-08-19  6:47 ` [PATCH 2/7] iio: adc: ad7606: move 'val' pointer to ad7606_scan_direct() Alexandru Ardelean
2024-08-19  6:47 ` [PATCH 3/7] iio: adc: ad7606: split a 'ad7606_sw_mode_setup()' from probe Alexandru Ardelean
2024-08-19  6:47 ` [PATCH 4/7] iio: adc: ad7606: wrap channel ranges & scales into struct Alexandru Ardelean
2024-08-19  6:47 ` [PATCH 5/7] iio: adc: ad7606: rework available attributes for SW channels Alexandru Ardelean
2024-08-19  6:47 ` [PATCH 6/7] dt-bindings: iio: adc: add adi,ad7606c-{16,18} compatible strings Alexandru Ardelean
2024-08-19 13:09   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-20  4:51     ` Alexandru Ardelean
2024-08-21 20:26       ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-23  9:09         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-28 10:23           ` Alexandru Ardelean
2024-08-19  6:47 ` [PATCH 7/7] iio: adc: ad7606: add support for AD7606C-{16,18} parts Alexandru Ardelean
2024-08-19 15:07   ` kernel test robot
2024-08-19 15:33   ` David Lechner [this message]
2024-08-23 15:54     ` Alexandru Ardelean
2024-08-23 18:04       ` David Lechner
2024-08-23 19:19   ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-27 13:53     ` Alexandru Ardelean

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3c4edf41-fd3b-4258-9b9e-a81b25568403@baylibre.com \
    --to=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=aardelean@baylibre.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gstols@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox