devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Biao Huang <biao.huang@mediatek.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	Fabien Parent <fparent@baylibre.com>,
	Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>, John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
	Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
	Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@mediatek.com>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
	Yinghua Pan <ot_yinghua.pan@mediatek.com>,
	<srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
	Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 09/10] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: separate tx/rx handling with two NAPIs
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 13:44:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f42845aafce14dcd96a83690fe296eb9eb6b50d.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220623213431.23528544@kernel.org>

Dear Jakub,
	Thanks for your comments~

On Thu, 2022-06-23 at 21:34 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:05:44 +0800 Biao Huang wrote:
> > +	if (rx || tx) {
> > +		spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> > +		/* mask Rx and TX Complete interrupt */
> > +		mtk_star_disable_dma_irq(priv, rx, tx);
> > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> 
> You do _irqsave / _irqrestore here
We should invoke spin_lock, no need save/store irq here.
> 
> > +		if (rx)
> > +			__napi_schedule_irqoff(&priv->rx_napi);
> > +		if (tx)
> > +			__napi_schedule_irqoff(&priv->tx_napi);
> 
> Yet assume _irqoff here.
> 
> So can this be run from non-IRQ context or not?
seems __napi_schedule is more proper for our case, we'll modify it in
next send.
> 
> > -	if (mtk_star_ring_full(ring))
> > +	if (unlikely(mtk_star_tx_ring_avail(ring) < MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1))
> >  		netif_stop_queue(ndev);
> 
> Please look around other drivers (like ixgbe) and copy the way they
> handle safe stopping of the queues. You need to add some barriers and
> re-check after disabling.
Yes, we look drivers from other vendors, and will do similar thing in
next send.
> 
> > -	spin_unlock_bh(&priv->lock);
> > -
> >  	mtk_star_dma_resume_tx(priv);
> >  
> >  	return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> 
> 
> > +	while ((entry != head) && (count < MTK_STAR_RING_NUM_DESCS -
> > 1)) {
> >  
> 
> Parenthesis unnecessary, so is the empty line after the while ().
Yes, the empty line will be removed in next send.
> 
> >  		ret = mtk_star_tx_complete_one(priv);
> >  		if (ret < 0)
> >  			break;
> > +
> > +		count++;
> > +		pkts_compl++;
> > +		bytes_compl += ret;
> > +		entry = ring->tail;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	__netif_tx_lock_bh(netdev_get_tx_queue(priv->ndev, 0));
> >  	netdev_completed_queue(ndev, pkts_compl, bytes_compl);
> > +	__netif_tx_unlock_bh(netdev_get_tx_queue(priv->ndev, 0));
> 
> what are you taking this lock for?
In this version, we encounter some issue related to
__QUEUE_STATE_STACK_OFF, 
and if we add __netif_tx_lock_bh here, it disappears.

When recieve your comments, we survey netdev_completed_queue handles in
drivers from other vendors, we beleive the __QUEUE_STATE_STACK_OFF
issue may caused by unproper usage of __napi_schedule_irqoff in
previous lines, and we'll remove __netif_tx_lock_bh, and have another
try.

If our local stress test pass, corresponding modification will be added
in next send.
> 
> > -	if (wake && netif_queue_stopped(ndev))
> > +	if (unlikely(netif_queue_stopped(ndev)) &&
> > +	    (mtk_star_tx_ring_avail(ring) > MTK_STAR_TX_THRESH))
> >  		netif_wake_queue(ndev);
> >  
> > -	spin_unlock(&priv->lock);
> > +	if (napi_complete(napi)) {
> > +		spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->lock, flags);
> > +		mtk_star_enable_dma_irq(priv, false, true);
> > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->lock, flags);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -1475,6 +1514,7 @@ static int mtk_star_set_timing(struct
> > mtk_star_priv *priv)
> >  
> >  	return regmap_write(priv->regs, MTK_STAR_REG_TEST0, delay_val);
> >  }
> > +
> >  static int mtk_star_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >  	struct device_node *of_node;
> 
> spurious whitespace change
Yes, will fix it in next send.

Best Regards!
Biao


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-28  5:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-22  9:05 [PATCH net-next v3 00/10] add more features for mtk-star-emac Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05 ` [PATCH net-next v3 01/10] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: store bit_clk_div in compat structure Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05 ` [PATCH net-next v3 02/10] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: modify IRQ trigger flags Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05 ` [PATCH net-next v3 03/10] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: add support for MT8365 SoC Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05 ` [PATCH net-next v3 04/10] dt-bindings: net: mtk-star-emac: add support for MT8365 Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05 ` [PATCH net-next v3 05/10] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: add clock pad selection for RMII Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05 ` [PATCH net-next v3 06/10] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: add timing adjustment support Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05 ` [PATCH net-next v3 07/10] dt-bindings: net: mtk-star-emac: add description for new properties Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05 ` [PATCH net-next v3 08/10] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: add support for MII interface Biao Huang
2022-06-22  9:05 ` [PATCH net-next v3 09/10] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: separate tx/rx handling with two NAPIs Biao Huang
2022-06-24  4:34   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-28  5:44     ` Biao Huang [this message]
2022-06-22  9:05 ` [PATCH net-next v3 10/10] net: ethernet: mtk-star-emac: enable half duplex hardware support Biao Huang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3f42845aafce14dcd96a83690fe296eb9eb6b50d.camel@mediatek.com \
    --to=biao.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=Mark-MC.Lee@mediatek.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=fparent@baylibre.com \
    --cc=john@phrozen.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=macpaul.lin@mediatek.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ot_yinghua.pan@mediatek.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).