From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lelvem-ot01.ext.ti.com (lelvem-ot01.ext.ti.com [198.47.23.234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEC7120F087; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 22:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.23.234 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744929555; cv=none; b=D6B9F9Jmu7EcoRi738LbJVlVydZzOeCon8jOlu1XKEicJOz4l4/TczrooAJa0hyiPwCKSyx6aw+RVkMmG2bGazKiMaNR+6Ul8R3zgxODirRIY0oTKqMNESZS9pCd2j/318bxwfKqjI/L71y+v8Ef+Un3WRI7Zp8+/VZ9ppDckM8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744929555; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5WqWlcIveNteoAGBdrjqB+Xha02+8TcvSi1tpAGku3g=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:CC:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=fUcbWSqLwYwvx98M+2E727nSqiM9kxOYQVyvjkUhc/xw0Z8+ISHuQaxGSHOoWubSyLJx3YZ37i8DDsqXDrT3xEn4OkW25w72tXYb2dMy4QVm9cVsTuts9h18IAlEj5vBwNwBrFn8hMsOO32ED6tBFcm+LBOK744dEHeiAQH77j8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b=SB786bVS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.23.234 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="SB786bVS" Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by lelvem-ot01.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 53HMckqm128952 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 17 Apr 2025 17:38:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1744929526; bh=AWUb8tvMlFEEKiPyxJvkrbL7zQiJ0ZFreEAhyJ2fFBM=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=SB786bVSicD/RGT2a0FA9PliFRhuiEAqaSH6x58qO4otFNDogMgJUa4MwgUbpC6Yy NorwiI+ILQbf0baXQrEFnOI+Wa5FCDqvJ6D4lsMN3GWdfddS6i5gTMOMny00IRKQw9 N0NdtXLWdJqQAZCkQSyyQiyepX8aDSONeUGkJhb8= Received: from DLEE108.ent.ti.com (dlee108.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.38]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 53HMckfe095464 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 17 Apr 2025 17:38:46 -0500 Received: from DLEE103.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.33) by DLEE108.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 17:38:45 -0500 Received: from lelvsmtp6.itg.ti.com (10.180.75.249) by DLEE103.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 17:38:45 -0500 Received: from [128.247.81.105] (judy-hp.dhcp.ti.com [128.247.81.105]) by lelvsmtp6.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 53HMcjf6099463; Thu, 17 Apr 2025 17:38:45 -0500 Message-ID: <41cb896b-be6c-4594-aa73-a5a475d49d05@ti.com> Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2025 17:38:45 -0500 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix V1P8_SIGNAL_ENA To: Francesco Dolcini CC: Ulf Hansson , Adrian Hunter , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , , , , Josua Mayer , Moteen Shah , Hiago De Franco References: <20250417182652.3521104-1-jm@ti.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Judith Mendez In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-C2ProcessedOrg: 333ef613-75bf-4e12-a4b1-8e3623f5dcea Hi Francesco, On 4/17/25 2:22 PM, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 01:26:50PM -0500, Judith Mendez wrote: >> There are eMMC boot failures seen with V1P8_SIGNAL_ENA on Kingston >> eMMC and variouse types of SD cards on Sitara K3 SoCs due to the >> sequencing when enumerating to HS200 mode. Since V1P8_SIGNAL_ENA is >> optional for eMMC, do not set V1P8_SIGNAL_ENA by default for eMMC. >> For SD cards we shall parse DT for ti,suppress-v1p8-ena property >> to determine whether to apply the quirk. > > I assume this ti,suppress-v1p8-ena should be added to some SoC dtsi, am I > wrong? > I was planning to add in a separate series once this was merged but I can add to v3 no problem, thanks for reviewing. ~ Judith