From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 00/31] iommu/exynos: Fixes and Enhancements of System MMU driver with DT Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 20:21:48 +0200 Message-ID: <4231522.iA1YhEv1iL@wuerfel> References: <1398584283-22846-1-git-send-email-shaik.ameer@samsung.com> <20140506175904.GB12376@8bytes.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140506175904.GB12376-zLv9SwRftAIdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org Cc: Linux DeviceTree , Linux Samsung SOC , Prathyush , Grant Grundler , "supash.ramaswamy" , Linux Kernel , Tomasz Figa , Varun Sethi , Sachin Kamat , Linux IOMMU , Kukjin Kim , Sylwester Nawrocki , Antonios Motakis , Shaik Ameer Basha , sunil joshi , Cho KyongHo , Tomasz Figa , Rahul Sharma List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 06 May 2014 19:59:05 Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 04:27:10PM +0530, Shaik Ameer Basha wrote: > > This series is going on for quite a long time and most of the patches here > > doesn't depend on dt bindings. As Exynos IOMMU h/w is introducing new versions > > very frequently, maintaining and reviewing all these patches again and > > again is quite a hard job. > > > > If it is acceptable, I can post one more series with the subset of > > above patches, > > which doesn't depend on dt-bindings. As all the patches which doesn't depend on > > DT bindings are already tested, I hope merging these subset of patches may help > > in reducing the rework and review effort every time. > > > > Once we finalize the generic DT bindings for the IOMMU devices, the driver > > can be updated with the proposed DT bindings in mind. > > Sounds reasonable to me if the patch subset is self-contained. When > Arnd is OK with that and no one else has objections I can take the > dt-independend parts. Sounds good to me. Arnd