From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/6] ARM: dts: Add SoC level device tree support for LS1021A Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 13:50:09 +0200 Message-ID: <4286278.g3iXMFknkK@wuerfel> References: <1410253952-15631-1-git-send-email-jingchang.lu@freescale.com> <1410253952-15631-2-git-send-email-jingchang.lu@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1410253952-15631-2-git-send-email-jingchang.lu-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org Cc: Jingchang Lu , shawn.guo-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Chenhui Zhao , Chao Fu , Shaveta Leekha , Suresh Gupta , Bhupesh Sharma , Xiubo Li , Ruchika Gupta , Jingchang Lu , Nikhil Badola List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 09 September 2014 17:12:27 Jingchang Lu wrote: > + dcfg: dcfg@1ee0000 { > + compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-dcfg"; > + reg = <0x0 0x1ee0000 0x0 0x10000>; > + }; > + scfg: scfg@1570000 { > + compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-scfg"; > + reg = <0x0 0x1570000 0x0 0x10000>; > + }; Should these be marked as 'compatible = "syscon"' as well? > + dcsr { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + compatible = "fsl,dcsr", "simple-bus"; > + > + ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x20000000 0x1000000>; > + > + dcsr-epu@0 { > + compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-dcsr-epu"; > + reg = <0x0 0x10000>; > + }; The binding document only specifies a generic "fsl,dcsr-epu", not "fsl,ls1021a-dcsr-epu". It also mandates that "interrupts" must be present and contain three interrupt lines. Please fix either the DT or the binding, so they match. > + dcsr-gdi@100000 { > + compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-dcsr-gdi"; > + reg = <0x100000 0x10000>; > + }; > + > + dcsr-dddi@120000 { > + compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-dcsr-dddi"; > + reg = <0x120000 0x10000>; > + }; > + > + dcsr-dcfg@220000 { > + compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-dcsr-dcfg"; > + reg = <0x220000 0x1000>; > + }; > + > + dcsr-clock@221000 { > + compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-dcsr-clock"; > + reg = <0x221000 0x1000>; > + }; None of these are part of the dcsr.txt binding. > + dcsr-rcpm@222000 { > + compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-dcsr-rcpm"; > + reg = <0x222000 0x1000 0x223000 0x1000>; > + }; Missing generic fsl,dcsr-rcpm compatible value again. > + dcsr-ccp@225000 { > + compatible = "fsl,ls1021a-dcsr-ccp"; > + reg = <0x225000 0x1000>; > + }; I'm not checking any devices below this one, I assume they are mostly incomplete, so please go through the whole list and make sure they all match the documentation. I can't really find any code using the dcsr in Linux. Is there an out of tree driver that you plan to submit? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html