Re: [PATCH v5 02/12] mmc: mediatek: add support of mt2701/mt2712

[Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>]

On 10/18/2017 03:46 AM, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, Matthias:
> 
> On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 09:49 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>
>> On 10/15/2017 10:26 AM, CK Hu wrote:
>>> Hi, Chaotian:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 10:41 +0800, Chaotian Jing wrote:
>>>> mt2701/mt2712 has 12bit clock div, which is not compatible with
>>>> mt8135/mt8173. and, some additional features will be added in
>>>> mt2701/mt2712, so that need distinguish it by comatibale name.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>>>    1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
>>>> index 267f7ab..643c795 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
>> [...]
>>>> @@ -350,6 +358,31 @@ struct msdc_host {
>>>>    	struct msdc_tune_para saved_tune_para; /* tune result of CMD21/CMD19 */
>>>>    };
>>>>    
>>>> +static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt8135_compat = {
>>>> +	.clk_div_bits = 8,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt8173_compat = {
>>>> +	.clk_div_bits = 8,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt2701_compat = {
>>>> +	.clk_div_bits = 12,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt2712_compat = {
>>>> +	.clk_div_bits = 12,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct of_device_id msdc_of_ids[] = {
>>>> +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8135-mmc", .data = &mt8135_compat},
>>>> +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-mmc", .data = &mt8173_compat},
>>>
>>> Because mt8135_compat is equal to mt8173_compat, so I think the
>>> compatible of "mediatek,mt8173-mmc" is redundant. You could just keep
>>> compatible of "mediatek,mt8135-mmc" in driver, and use
>>> "mediatek,mt8135-mmc" for both mt8135.dtsi and mt8173.dtsi.
>>>
>>
>> Well thing is, that in the follow-up patches, new data types get added to the
>> different compat structures and in the end all four a different.
> 
> You are right, these modification are necessary. If so, adding
> "mediatek,mt8173-mmc" in the patch of "add support of mt2701/mt2712"
> looks irrelevant. Maybe the title should be modified as "add support of
> mt8173/mt2701/mt2712" or move mt8173 part to another patch.
> 

I would prefer to split it in two patches. But I leave that to Ulf to decide 
what he prefers.

Regards,
Matthias