From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: realview: basic device tree implementation Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 15:38:14 +0200 Message-ID: <4386397.P7WlMhNVxk@wuerfel> References: <1399586896-16906-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> <5678119.IM3FN0FlT6@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org Cc: Linus Walleij , Mark Rutland , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Pawel Moll , Rob Herring , Marc Zyngier , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Feng Kan , Thomas Gleixner List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 22 May 2014 15:04:07 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thursday 22 May 2014 09:41:39 Linus Walleij wrote: > > >> The question can be rephrased like this: > >> Should we create drivers/soc? > > > > I think we just did, not sure if the patches have made it into linux-next > > already, but there were a couple of other platforms already that want this > > directory. > > Awesomeness. Can you give me the title of a patch or branch > from ARM SoC I should pull in to build on top of this? Then I can > split off all the SoC bus business and have the machine file real > small, nice and clean. I'd have to check again, it seems that as of today, there is no drivers/soc on arm-soc yet. I do remember that there were at least two platforms besides yours that want it though, so we have to coordinate it a bit. Then again, as I expect all of them to go through arm-soc, we can probably resolve the conflicts in our tree. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html