From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sven Eckelmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/49] ath11k: add debug.c Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 09:35:54 +0200 Message-ID: <4441194.D8eDD6Tzdi@bentobox> References: <1566316095-27507-1-git-send-email-kvalo@codeaurora.org> <2708501.D2hezO5Rnt@bentobox> <80bdedf3740960e0ce05b02a77d1b457@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2493492.G6y1Xp12sA"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <80bdedf3740960e0ce05b02a77d1b457-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Anilkumar Kolli Cc: ath11k-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Kalle Valo List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --nextPart2493492.G6y1Xp12sA Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Tuesday, 27 August 2019 09:33:39 CEST Anilkumar Kolli wrote: [...] > > [ 4312.884650] The reading for sensor 4 is 0x002041f7 > > [ 4312.891499] The reading for sensor 5 is 0x002051f4 > > [ 4312.896415] Couldn't get reading for sensor 6 > > [ 4312.901189] Couldn't get reading for sensor 7 > > [ 4312.905561] The reading for sensor 8 is 0x002081e0 > > [ 4312.909902] The reading for sensor 9 is 0x002091f7 > > [ 4312.914645] Couldn't get reading for sensor 10 > > [ 4312.919364] The reading for sensor 11 is 0x0020b1fa > > [ 4312.923791] The reading for sensor 12 is 0x0020c1fa > > [ 4312.928621] Couldn't get reading for sensor 13 > > [ 4312.933425] The reading for sensor 14 is 0x0020e1f4 > > [ 4312.937941] The reading for sensor 15 is 0x0020f1e7 > > [ 4313.942700] Rebooting in 3 seconds.. > > > > Maybe can be fixed by a different kernel (for the remoteproc). But I > > don't > > have this kernel at the moment. > > > > The write of an "assert", sends 'WMI_FORCE_FW_HANG_CMDID' WMI command to > target firmware. > This WMI command forces the target to assert. Yes, but it shouldn't kill the complete system. Kind regards, Sven --nextPart2493492.G6y1Xp12sA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEF10rh2Elc9zjMuACXYcKB8Eme0YFAl1k3VoACgkQXYcKB8Em e0a9MA//dLviXuRMjJGR01qJslAHx12n9IorBsRkDov60rQnOk+6rClZmgUHW4xI RSNvzfGlTy9IH+vbmdsNKfK8ixnw9g4m8L5wxwzjGSjEOmerQOxHSsnOu9zTZnWG AXlgdDSWfI06nx42aehdzZ9P6dgh0jpHIdc3m3t+qdhKsi4Tp3wA0aGyWdwaw2Qd Ok34en5klPN629oEUEVIiPqvpr2xymiKrSnGx3F1cxXY7+hG9JtDhXj9jgVUlSXi F76GSE5y/oEwZ0rCvziqismYir/xJntI7e2PX1IOLC3LirFkJvGY1J80ZaQRmyas DQqt069SZL3bzsQn/FnQ/kgPJM6iTW0JkmThyLwPiy0ITJUQBQxJpUALP/kRPcrg 7L9c3uox6qMu/PKwUsgS/uxVWQ6t0X0BYX5ZQkl9pgM81gd0UG6CIov2x0tybkzX rVCyVfVWPIA2OKbiExwZG201zghNu56Gzl7+lhWZFFy4FNBZUwcilONDHhECfuEi 0wrVx9UCMrxDMC8BZHa2mQV6+Bu9qbBz1eogQbtbtWk5A37iiQsvwGUZTU8q756p I0BR+ZcBlW09kd9oyWOdXGnvOYjmyasT4uZatCYEWwdplXcfHCuA3oRrt3b61SsJ f12M3O/Umhq0rBL/bx/ZxNeZF4F2msSDi0PW+w6mFdGaPqgwLpc= =I7YO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2493492.G6y1Xp12sA--