From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 6/8] scsi: ufs: make the UFS variant a platform device Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:50:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4607478.zVSfzXyPzA@wuerfel> References: <1441205138-12664-1-git-send-email-ygardi@codeaurora.org> <1441205138-12664-7-git-send-email-ygardi@codeaurora.org> <2dce3d8d918e124eb29afa7a59607bca.squirrel@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <2dce3d8d918e124eb29afa7a59607bca.squirrel@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: subhashj@codeaurora.org Cc: Yaniv Gardi , robherring2@gmail.com, james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, pebolle@tiscali.nl, hch@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, santoshsy@gmail.com, linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org, gbroner@codeaurora.org, draviv@codeaurora.org, Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Vinayak Holikatti , "James E.J. Bottomley" , Christoph Hellwig , Sujit Reddy Thumma , Raviv Shvili , Sahitya Tummala , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 22 October 2015 07:02:14 subhashj@codeaurora.org wrote: > > > > Required properties: > > -- compatible : compatible list, contains "jedec,ufs-1.1" > > +- compatible : compatible list, contains "jedec,ufs-1.1" or > > + "qcom,msm8994-ufshc" or "qcom,msm8996-ufshc" > > Are we really using these "qcom,msm8994-ufshc" or "qcom,msm8996-ufshc" > compatible string anywhere? We should list them in either case, but it could be clarified as: compatible : must contain "jedec,ufs-1.1", may also list one or more of the following: "qcom,msm8994-ufshc" "qcom,msm8996-ufshc" "qcom,ufshc" Arnd