From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Pinchart Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v2 2/2] gpio-rcar: Add DT support Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 09:32:32 +0200 Message-ID: <4646425.XBU4xZJKKv@avalon> References: <1369136406-23800-1-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> <4678059.RuWR6CiQ8n@avalon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Laurent Pinchart , "linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Magnus Damm , Guennadi Liakhovetski List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Linus, On Friday 31 May 2013 09:01:44 Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:20 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > I've so far pushed GPIO and pinctrl patches for SH through Simon's tree > > due to the many cross-dependencies between SH arch code and the GPIO and > > pinctrl drivers. As the situation now stabilizes, we could now push the > > patches through their respective subsystem trees. > > > > Simon, Linus, any opinion/preference on that ? > > Depends, if they are still large patch sets I'd prefer Simon to > take it, but once the drivers are in place and going to maintenance > mode I'll handle them in pinctrl. Let's make the switch for v3.12 then if that's fine with you. > >> The above ranges are part of that document. > > > > What about replacing that with > > > > - gpio-ranges: Range of pins managed by the GPIO controller. > > > > Please refer to gpio.txt in this directory for details of gpio-ranges > > property and the common GPIO bindings used by client devices. > > Go for it! Thanks. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart