Re: [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: connector: add optional properties for Type-B

[Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>]

Hi,

On 12-03-19 04:18, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> Hi,
> On Mon, 2019-03-11 at 09:06 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11-03-19 06:33, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2019-03-08 at 13:07 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 08-03-19 07:13, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
>>>>> Add id-gpios, vbus-gpios, vbus-supply and pinctrl properties for
>>>>> usb-b-connector
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>     .../devicetree/bindings/connector/usb-connector.txt    | 10 ++++++++++
>>>>>     1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/connector/usb-connector.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/connector/usb-connector.txt
>>>>> index a9a2f2fc44f2..7a07b0f4f973 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/connector/usb-connector.txt
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/connector/usb-connector.txt
>>>>> @@ -17,6 +17,16 @@ Optional properties:
>>>>>     - self-powered: Set this property if the usb device that has its own power
>>>>>       source.
>>>>>     
>>>>> +Optional properties for usb-b-connector:
>>>>> +- id-gpios: gpio for USB ID pin.
>>>>
>>>> What about boards where the ID pin is *not* connected to a GPIO,
>>>> but e.g. to a special pin on the PMIC which can also detect
>>>> an ACA adapter ? Currently this case is handled by extcon
>>>> drivers, but we have no way to set e.g. vbus-supply for the
>>>> connector. Maybe in this case the usb-connector node should
>>>> be a child of the PMIC node ?
>>> Yes, it would be, PMIC is in charger of detecting the status of ID pin
>>
>> Ok, then I think this should be documented too.
>>
>>>> And in many cases there also is a mux to switch the datalines
>>>> between the host and device(gadget) controllers, how should
>>>> that be described in this model?  See the new usb-role-switch
>>>> code under drivers/usb/roles
>>>>
>>>> In some cases the mux is controlled through a gpio, so we
>>>> may want to add a "mux-gpios" here in which case we also
>>>> need to define what 0/1 means.
>>> I'm not sure, the mux seems not belong to this connector,
>>> and may need another driver to register usb-role-switch,
>>> similar to:
>>>
>>> [v2,2/2] usb: typec: add typec switch via GPIO control
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10834327/
>>
>> Right the mux/role-switch will need a driver, but the "owner"
>> of the usb_connector, e.g. the PMIC or the owner of the
>> id GPIO pin needs to know which device is the role-switch so
>> that it can set the role correctly based on the id-pin.
>>
>> Your binding already contains Vbus info, allowing the owner
>> of the usb_connector to enable/disable Vbus based on the id-pin,
>> but the owner will also be responsible for setting the role-switch.
> In this patch series, I make usb_connector driver enable/disable Vbus,
> but not the parent(USB controller) of usb_connector which registers a
> usb-role-switch, which way do you think it is better?

IMHO there should not be a driver for the usb_connector child-node,
only for the parent-device of that child-node.

There are going to be too many specific setups surrounding PMICs to
be able to do a single generic driver for the connector.

Regards,

Hans