Re: [PATCH v4 RESEND 0/8] ipq9574: Enable PCI-Express support

[mr.nuke.me@gmail.com]

On 5/1/24 5:22 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 01/05/2024 06:28, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
>> There are four PCIe ports on IPQ9574, pcie0 thru pcie3. This series
>> addresses pcie2, which is a gen3x2 port. The board I have only uses
>> pcie2, and that's the only one enabled in this series. pcie3 is added
>> as a special request, but is untested.
>>
>> I believe this makes sense as a monolithic series, as the individual
>> pieces are not that useful by themselves.
>>
>> In v2, I've had some issues regarding the dt schema checks. For
>> transparency, I used the following test invocations to test:
>>
>>        make dt_binding_check     DT_SCHEMA_FILES=qcom,pcie.yaml:qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml
>>        make dtbs_check           DT_SCHEMA_FILES=qcom,pcie.yaml:qcom,ipq8074-qmp-pcie-phy.yaml
>>
>> Changes since v3:
>>   - "const"ify .hw.init fields for the PCIE pipe clocks
>>   - Used pciephy_v5_regs_layout instead of v4 in phy-qcom-qmp-pcie.c
>>   - Included Manivannan's patch for qcom-pcie.c clocks
>>   - Dropped redundant comments in "ranges" and "interrupt-map" of pcie2.
>>   - Added pcie3 and pcie3_phy dts nodes
>>   - Moved snoc and anoc clocks to PCIe controller from PHY
>>
> 
> Three postings within short time... Allow people to actually review your
> code. Please wait 24h before posting new version. Include entire
> feedback and all tags. Explain why you ignore/skip some tags.
> 
I'm sorry for the confusion. It's the same patch version, v3 being two 
weeks old.

Due to a tooling failure, the first attempt to send resulted in a 
double-posting, and missing cover letter. It was so bad that I felt I 
needed to re-post with the RESEND tag to clarify the intent and prevent 
further confusion.

Alex
>