public inbox for devicetree@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Cc: jonas@kwiboo.se, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@nabladev.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] ARM: dts: rockchip: Add support for RV1103B
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 22:24:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47923648.fMDQidcC6G@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260216010219.2131484-2-festevam@gmail.com>

Am Montag, 16. Februar 2026, 02:02:17 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb Fabio Estevam:
> From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@nabladev.com>
> 
> Add the initial RV1103B devicetree.
> 
> Based on the 5.10 Rockchip vendor kernel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@nabladev.com>
> ---
> The <dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rv1103b-cru.h> header comes from another
> series:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20260210022620.172570-1-festevam@gmail.com/
> 
> Maybe Heiko could apply the clock series as well?
> 
> Changes since v4:
> - None.
> 
>  .../boot/dts/rockchip/rv1103b-pinctrl.dtsi    | 816 ++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1103b.dtsi       | 257 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 1073 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1103b-pinctrl.dtsi
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1103b.dtsi


> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1103b.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1103b.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..5955b249d4ce
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rockchip/rv1103b.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,257 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2024 Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd.
> + */
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/rockchip,rv1103b-cru.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/rockchip.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/soc/rockchip,boot-mode.h>
> +
> +/ {
> +	#address-cells = <1>;
> +	#size-cells = <1>;
> +
> +	compatible = "rockchip,rv1103b";
> +
> +	interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
> +
> +	arm-pmu {
> +		compatible = "arm,cortex-a7-pmu";
> +		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 127 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +		interrupt-affinity = <&cpu0>;
> +	};
> +
> +	xin32k: oscillator-32k {
> +		compatible = "fixed-clock";
> +		clock-frequency = <32768>;
> +		clock-output-names = "xin32k";
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +	};

Please double-check where that xin32k is coming from in device-schematics.
Yes the xin24m is normally a dedicated oscillator, but the xin32k in
most cases is generated from the system-pmic.

So please check and most likely move that to the board dts.

Also, please sort node-names alphabetically (if there is no address)


> +	xin24m: oscillator-24m {
> +		compatible = "fixed-clock";
> +		clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> +		clock-output-names = "xin24m";
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +	};
> +
> +	cpus {
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +		cpu0: cpu@0 {
> +			device_type = "cpu";
> +			compatible = "arm,cortex-a7";
> +			reg = <0x0>;
> +			clocks = <&cru ARMCLK>;
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	timer {
> +		compatible = "arm,armv7-timer";
> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>,
> +			     <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
> +		clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> +	};
> +
> +	pinctrl: pinctrl {
> +		compatible = "rockchip,rv1103b-pinctrl";
> +		rockchip,grf = <&ioc>;
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <1>;
> +		ranges;
> +
> +		gpio0: gpio@20520000 {
> +			compatible = "rockchip,gpio-bank";
> +			reg = <0x20520000 0x200>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 75 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			clocks = <&cru PCLK_PMU_GPIO0>, <&cru DBCLK_PMU_GPIO0>;
> +			gpio-controller;
> +			#gpio-cells = <2>;
> +			interrupt-controller;
> +			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
> +		};
> +
> +		gpio1: gpio@20d80000 {
> +			compatible = "rockchip,gpio-bank";
> +			reg = <0x20d80000 0x200>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 79 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			clocks = <&cru PCLK_GPIO1>, <&cru DBCLK_GPIO1>;
> +			gpio-controller;
> +			#gpio-cells = <2>;
> +			interrupt-controller;
> +			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
> +		};
> +
> +		gpio2: gpio@20840000 {
> +			compatible = "rockchip,gpio-bank";
> +			reg = <0x20840000 0x200>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 83 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			clocks = <&cru PCLK_GPIO2>, <&cru DBCLK_GPIO2>;
> +			gpio-controller;
> +			#gpio-cells = <2>;
> +			interrupt-controller;
> +			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
> +		};
> +	};
> +
> +	soc {
> +		compatible = "simple-bus";
> +		#address-cells = <1>;
> +		#size-cells = <1>;
> +		ranges;
> +
> +		cru: clock-controller@20000000 {
> +			compatible = "rockchip,rv1103b-cru";
> +			reg = <0x20000000 0x81000>;
> +			#clock-cells = <1>;
> +			#reset-cells = <1>;
> +			bootph-all;

I don't think we want u-boot-specific properties in mainline.
They are normally kept in separate -u-boot.dtsi files

> +		};

[...]

> +		uart1: serial@20870000 {
> +			compatible = "rockchip,rv1103b-uart", "snps,dw-apb-uart";

uart compatible, does not seem to have landed in the uart tree

> +			reg = <0x20870000 0x100>;
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 70 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			reg-shift = <2>;
> +			reg-io-width = <4>;
> +			clocks = <&cru SCLK_UART1>, <&cru PCLK_UART1>;
> +			clock-names = "baudclk", "apb_pclk";
> +			pinctrl-names = "default";
> +			pinctrl-0 = <&uart1m0_xfer>;
> +			status = "disabled";
> +		};

[...]

> +		wdt: watchdog@208d0000 {
> +			compatible = "snps,dw-wdt";

please add a new compatible to the dw-wdt watchdog binding

> +			reg = <0x208d0000 0x100>;
> +			clocks = <&cru TCLK_WDT_NS>, <&cru PCLK_WDT_NS>;
> +			clock-names = "tclk", "pclk";
> +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 29 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +			status = "disabled";
> +		};
> +


Heiko



  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-09 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-16  1:02 [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: rockchip: grf: Add RV1103B compatibles Fabio Estevam
2026-02-16  1:02 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] ARM: dts: rockchip: Add support for RV1103B Fabio Estevam
2026-03-09 21:24   ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2026-03-10 23:26     ` Fabio Estevam
2026-02-16  1:02 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Add Omega4 Evaluation board Fabio Estevam
2026-02-16 17:47   ` Conor Dooley
2026-02-16  1:02 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] ARM: dts: rockchip: Add Onion Omega4 Evaluation Board Fabio Estevam
2026-03-09 14:57 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: soc: rockchip: grf: Add RV1103B compatibles Fabio Estevam
2026-03-09 19:40   ` Heiko Stuebner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47923648.fMDQidcC6G@phil \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=festevam@nabladev.com \
    --cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox