From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com (bali.collaboradmins.com [148.251.105.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F6F125743E; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 14:42:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752504153; cv=none; b=rDiIi/JQnSfI+NO3JDD39PimXydmDTZiHJjMLys86x+xLSssUtWDWzlH5Rp0DR45UBclPYWPx5CzAVozyWLolPKD3RM98yND+5mrgZAlqFoVNRICaJpOaDkqQNhTXyRksbWvRJN3pVPl41ulzyiuF9n4P8+dGkuMCYlUOZwVGDs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752504153; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0VtL9HUqlMsmAiP98DqIfNZWGaoaVpSGJEtLSMSugIU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=pa0ZnopG1nzDvtkrO4SATQYo4H+fy1DDkHkgFnnT++8t2ND5Ww0ga3CBgJRuN4p7uaj7lCfU0zTcGzOY4ZqCbQSQ4g8hq8iYr/1Z5mKG6GnbHd0jMzHD2akibr3kWtPbT5o9TCoxkLejKthDeDUPTKwX6LhBeZJWaNhX3X+3Iu0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=Fjzlb4el; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="Fjzlb4el" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1752504149; bh=0VtL9HUqlMsmAiP98DqIfNZWGaoaVpSGJEtLSMSugIU=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=Fjzlb4elvs2yCknABpwicAp1UwFsAHWBn4kyGKDkYGP0aHfqQaTVHEKxfPSoU+C8y zx2vwvZdO/9XqCQzslZNRPRh8oVVsqAUxMQqBUnFNTJWMxqjwvATzL4qYDaJfttJs+ W14E22TEDoUvuwPR6RDXeXJQJFo+WxpLaykCiOuQUMqnErgKE5XaszRAJlGalO2Wsf +iJ5kNYFZMcs6jX+NRhB9GOm7hULVk+oc1uptlnNK7tRqSfSyoo/azsgKLMeehuitC TjpyKq305/Bug52wMKhQeM+nTOMO2EqBm6D1GTlNpzKHhZBShLirMUcayx4gdbQGaO WH7pc7Ba2DPnA== Received: from [192.168.1.100] (2-237-20-237.ip236.fastwebnet.it [2.237.20.237]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 98F1C17E01CC; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 16:42:28 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <47a6b9ac-a23b-4861-a3ba-f292acf1e79f@collabora.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 16:42:28 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] cpufreq: mediatek-hw: Separate per-domain and per-instance data To: Nicolas Frattaroli , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Matthias Brugger Cc: kernel@collabora.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org References: <20250714-mt8196-cpufreq-v2-0-cc85e78855c7@collabora.com> <20250714-mt8196-cpufreq-v2-3-cc85e78855c7@collabora.com> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20250714-mt8196-cpufreq-v2-3-cc85e78855c7@collabora.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Il 14/07/25 16:08, Nicolas Frattaroli ha scritto: > As it stood, the mediatek cpufreq driver could get away with never > really having a private driver instance struct. This is because all data > was stored in the per-domain structs. > > However, this complicates matters when actual per-instance data like the > variant struct is introduced. Instead of having a pointer to it for > every domain, have a pointer to a global "priv" struct that can be > extended over time, and rename the "data" struct to "domain" to > distinguish its purpose better. > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno