From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: add missing core_bi_pll_test_se GCC clock
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 16:34:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47bb59f1-c696-5be3-cc6e-f82f5ee0998e@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <279dc76c-9e60-dd93-e2d2-c2dad241620f@linaro.org>
On 28/12/2022 16:25, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 28/12/2022 13:50, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On 28/12/2022 13:55, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 28/12/2022 12:37, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 28.12.2022 12:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> The GCC bindings expect core_bi_pll_test_se clock input, even if it is
>>>>> optional:
>>>>>
>>>>> sm8350-mtp.dtb: clock-controller@100000: clock-names:2: 'core_bi_pll_test_se' was expected
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>> Is it even going to be used by anybody, or should we just drop
>>>> it on the driver side as per usual?
>>>
>>> It's mentioned as possible parent, so there might be users somewhere...
>>> Or you want to say that other binding and DTS users cannot use that clock?
>>
>> Yes. In the past few months we have been removing the core_bi_pll_test
>> from the old clock drivers (and new clock drivers mostly lack them).
>> Let's remove it from the rest of clock drivers.
>
> If you are going to start doing the same work, please at least share it
> upfront.
Excuse me.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-28 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-28 11:24 [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: add missing core_bi_pll_test_se GCC clock Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-12-28 11:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350-sony-xperia-sagami: specify which LDO modes are allowed Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-12-28 11:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: add missing core_bi_pll_test_se GCC clock Konrad Dybcio
2022-12-28 11:55 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-12-28 12:26 ` Konrad Dybcio
2022-12-28 12:50 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2022-12-28 14:25 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-12-28 14:34 ` Dmitry Baryshkov [this message]
2022-12-29 17:23 ` (subset) " Bjorn Andersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47bb59f1-c696-5be3-cc6e-f82f5ee0998e@linaro.org \
--to=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).