From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AFE0C4338F for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 03:39:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00EB60EB9 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 03:39:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232910AbhHKDkL (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2021 23:40:11 -0400 Received: from pi.codeconstruct.com.au ([203.29.241.158]:40224 "EHLO codeconstruct.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232795AbhHKDkL (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Aug 2021 23:40:11 -0400 Received: from [192.168.12.102] (unknown [159.196.94.94]) by mail.codeconstruct.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 850DA20134; Wed, 11 Aug 2021 11:39:42 +0800 (AWST) Message-ID: <47d77b0c67cade473c496a956754ad5fc3d074ca.camel@codeconstruct.com.au> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: net: New binding for mctp-i2c From: Matt Johnston To: Rob Herring Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang , Jeremy Kerr Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 11:39:41 +0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20210802040458.334732-1-matt@codeconstruct.com.au> <20210802040458.334732-2-matt@codeconstruct.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.0-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2021-08-02 at 10:45 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 10:12 PM Matt Johnston > wrote: > > > > +  slave functionality. The reg address must include > > I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS. > > This constraint can be a schema. The flag is already described in i2c.txt, is it OK to just make reference to that? Cheers, Matt