From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.manjaro.org (mail.manjaro.org [116.203.91.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 334DB1BD9C9; Mon, 29 Sep 2025 08:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.91.91 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759134784; cv=none; b=AKjwKM0hu29AfFsB1y2n0dyxvPYrjuRB6vxsDrYEXfFbLnGNqT7XSmZg7DC+zb4rMDieavf4ijKG/84BNkGHUpPDhm5a7m1IZB789PbWG6mvk4b4PCCqDDJmqKZ2Fv6+5Ni9C20qN87BcOBBq0XeHFDW8/ejsWz8U4ahF8cSaU8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759134784; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nMmASFdlBzIZVDIW2qCAKOeYGx4Il0flG/JZVLk/Bwo=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=Hnbt8QVpE7S0pk5H08oAzhFPqkaRwo30Ma/cN8Rfa1veytIoM1ekJuDUf1H6HNHXsueS/job4jf9jxPC9HjX+2C2cAGL4R4h94AyUW7YHJG4gXPGC43BYcO/GzmqqEmpYllUuMmH9uTC7MkpJey0IRJi9N1azGmx79KHHdPjTf4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b=r2V41+vf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.91.91 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b="r2V41+vf" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manjaro.org; s=2021; t=1759134780; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=n6IgvnJf+TwuohwKNDrr1f+Fnh1ZrNwh++ABQ4h5jac=; b=r2V41+vfGVhb91wQwN19qdC63ckj2jVdjphymcYJTu5Jx2T4hXThp+0oY3ErPz+RH7rTEt +93F1HDZZ9LX6LeLJMssOs2NZ5ZtHCCgMh/+vNumqvhI7E0jd6PT9/5NHEvmJ3sYOKOZid LXu+fHBDfCRweYj/Ne/22L20BtGfy1Jzl+gWO9zZ0wuV92UF/F53dZ0sVJoZFRfHBFhRs3 xWos+OQPdycV/ExXd2xwUPY68QE3ImwziUwhzEDpLqz0HY3QAGJBdhGkcYj/VI8kFXrslU TN5iTmXXB1ipMxjVRP8czyQjyl7gaPlZ3JxxQgEDNyVFOI4v1d5hBc20sRG9FA== Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 10:32:59 +0200 From: Dragan Simic To: guptarud@gmail.com Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Heiko Stuebner , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ondrej Jirman , Martijn Braam , =?UTF-8?Q?Kam?= =?UTF-8?Q?il_Trzci=C5=84ski?= , "Leonardo G. Trombetta" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Upstreaming Pinephone Pro Patches In-Reply-To: <20250929-ppp_light_accel_mag_vol-down-v4-0-6598f22d3451@gmail.com> References: <20250929-ppp_light_accel_mag_vol-down-v4-0-6598f22d3451@gmail.com> Message-ID: <49dafe9afc5962d8fec10e6135c9b84d@manjaro.org> X-Sender: dsimic@manjaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=dsimic@manjaro.org smtp.mailfrom=dsimic@manjaro.org Hello Rudraksha, On 2025-09-29 09:35, Rudraksha Gupta via B4 Relay wrote: > arm64: dts: rk3399-pinephone-pro: Add light/proximity sensor > support > arm64: dts: rk3399-pinephone-pro: Add accelerometer sensor > support > arm64: dts: rk3399-pinephone-pro: Add magnetometer sensor support > arm64: dts: rk3399-pinephone-pro: Fix voltage threshold for > volume keys Please note that the patch summaries/subjects are still a bit wrong in the v4 of this series, because there should be no "rk3399-pinephone-pro:" prefixes in them. You can always check the commit history for the file you're editing, to see what's the expected format of the patch summary. It differs a bit between the subsystems and architectures, so it should always be checked.