From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Timur Tabi Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/fsl: add device tree binding for QE firmware Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:48:43 -0500 Message-ID: <4BAD018B.6010309@freescale.com> References: <1269380552-10418-1-git-send-email-timur@freescale.com> <65327.84.105.60.153.1269481760.squirrel@gate.crashing.org> <4BAB7E67.6040707@freescale.com> <4BAB816F.5060405@firmworks.com> <4BAB9120.1060600@freescale.com> <4BACD011.5050609@freescale.com> <4BACFF7B.3010002@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: Grant Likely Cc: Scott Wood , devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Grant Likely wrote: > Nah. That looks totally fine. Not having the firmware under a qe > node would look bad to me. You don't think it weird to have one QE node reference data from another QE node, or that the DTS implies that the firmware belongs to one QE more than it belongs to the other? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale