From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [sodaville] [PATCH 03/11] x86/dtb: Add a device tree for CE4100 Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:26:23 -0800 Message-ID: <4CF3F04F.6090202@linux.intel.com> References: <1290706801-7323-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <1290706801-7323-4-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <1290808645.32570.158.camel@pasglop> <20101128160449.GC30784@www.tglx.de> <1290984809.32570.208.camel@pasglop> <4CF30327.9020408@firmworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4CF30327.9020408@firmworks.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mitch Bradley Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, sodaville@linutronix.de, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 11/28/2010 05:34 PM, Mitch Bradley wrote: > > The OLPC interface might be of some use as a starting point, but would > need some work. It is currently in use on AMD Geode, Via C7, and Intel > Atom based systems, but, among other issues, it conflicts with the > Physical Address Extension feature. > It conflicts with at least PAE, PAT and x86-64. Since NX requires PAE, it also conflicts with that. As such, I would think it would have to be considered obsolete. -hpa