From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: Re: [PATCH TIP v2 03/14] x86/dtb: Add a device tree for CE4100 Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:06:17 +0100 Message-ID: <4D4BCF99.2000108@linutronix.de> References: <1295843342-1122-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <1295843342-1122-4-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20110127050027.GB23443@yookeroo> <20110202185841.GA28674@www.tglx.de> <20110203210746.GI6180@angua.secretlab.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110203210746.GI6180-MrY2KI0G/OVr83L8+7iqerDks+cytr/Z@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: devicetree-discuss-bounces+gldd-devicetree-discuss=m.gmane.org-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org To: Grant Likely Cc: sodaville-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Grant Likely wrote: > You can go ahead and keep the revision history above the s-o-b and --- > lines. It turns out that having the revision history in the commit > text is actually useful when trying to figure out what version of a > patch actually got applied. Okay. >> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/ce4100/falconfalls.dts b/arch/x86/platform/ce4100/falconfalls.dts >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..e888657 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/ce4100/falconfalls.dts >> @@ -0,0 +1,424 @@ >> + soc@0 { >> + #address-cells = <1>; >> + #size-cells = <1>; >> + compatible = "intel,ce4100-cp"; > > You'll need to add blurbs to Documentation/devicetree/bindings > (Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings in Linus' tree; renamed in > linux-next) for each of these new compatible bindings to document the > part that they describe and any special properties that go with each > compatible value (if any). You can send it as a followup patch. Good point, will do. >> + gpio@b,1 { >> + compatible = "pci8086,2e67.2", >> + "pci8086,2e67", >> + "pciclassff0000", >> + "pciclassff00"; >> + >> + reg = <0x15900 0x0 0x0 0x0 0x0>; >> + interrupts = <15 1>; >> + }; > > You'll probably want to make use of the gpio-controller binding for > the gpio nodes so that other nodes can reference it. Not a > showstopper for this patch though. Right. I'll make it follow-up once I get to the gpio functionality. > Otherwise looks good to me. thanks. > g. Sebastian