devicetree.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: "grant.likely@secretlab.ca" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	"G, Manjunath Kondaiah" <manjugk@ti.com>,
	"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org"
	<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] OMAP3: beagleboard: Remove DT support from regular board
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:59:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E609B0A.1020804@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110902081246.GQ3548@atomide.com>

On 9/2/2011 10:12 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>  [110901 19:52]:
>> In order to avoid conflict with the new board-omap3-dt.c file,
>> remove the .dt_compat entry from the beagle regular board
>> file.
>>
>> Any DT work for OMAP3 will have to be done on the generic DT
>> board file to avoid breaking the legacy board support until
>> DT migration is done.
>
> In general we should not keep duplicate old non-DT data around
> now that we have the DT append support. Instead we should just
> require the .dts file appended to zImage for all mach-omap2
> machines. Otherwise we'll end up with double bloat :)

Mmm, I'm not sure to get your point. We are not duplicating, since a 
pure DT generic board will not have anything except a 
of_platform_populate(NULL, omap_dt_match_table, NULL, NULL);
And the regular board files will keep initializing devices statically.
The drivers will then for the moment support both pdata and DT method to 
get board parameters.

> So it's OK to have the DT entries in board files so drivers
> that get converted will work with them.

Well, it will be a little bit more tricky, because having DT in current 
board files will be a mess with a bunch of #ifdef CONFIG_OF, and adding 
DT compatible inside each boards will prevent the pure generic DT one to 
work. In that case we will duplicate the DT migration in every legacy 
boards files...

That's why the current strategy is to keep the current board files 
non-DT aware and add the DT support only to the generic DT board file.

Regards,
Benoit

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-02  8:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-01 17:25 [PATCH 0/7] OMAP3: Add basic DT support + i2c + twl Benoit Cousson
     [not found] ` <1314897912-18178-1-git-send-email-b-cousson-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-01 17:25   ` [PATCH 1/7] arm/dts: Add initial device-tree support for OMAP3 SoC Benoit Cousson
2011-09-01 17:25 ` [PATCH 2/7] arm/dts: OMAP3: Add mpu and iva nodes Benoit Cousson
2011-09-01 18:17   ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-05 15:05     ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-05 17:23       ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-05 17:46         ` Mitch Bradley
2011-09-06  7:15           ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-01 17:25 ` [PATCH 3/7] arm/dts: OMAP3: Add i2c controllers nodes Benoit Cousson
2011-09-01 17:25 ` [PATCH 4/7] arm/dts: omap3-beagle: Include the generic omap3.dtsi Benoit Cousson
2011-09-01 17:25 ` [PATCH 5/7] arm/dts: omap3-beagle: Add twl4030 and EEPROM i2c devices Benoit Cousson
2011-09-01 17:25 ` [PATCH 6/7] OMAP3: board-dt: Add generic board file for DT support Benoit Cousson
2011-09-02  8:09   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-02  8:46     ` Cousson, Benoit
     [not found]       ` <4E609800.9090402-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2011-09-02  9:08         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-02  9:13           ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-02  9:21             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-02  9:34               ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-02 10:43       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-02 11:43         ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-02 11:57           ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-02 12:20             ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-02 12:32               ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-05 12:09   ` G, Manjunath Kondaiah
2011-09-01 17:25 ` [PATCH 7/7] OMAP3: beagleboard: Remove DT support from regular board Benoit Cousson
2011-09-02  8:12   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-02  8:59     ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2011-09-02 10:48       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-09-02 12:35         ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-02 13:08           ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E609B0A.1020804@ti.com \
    --to=b-cousson@ti.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manjugk@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).