From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Ferre Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] tty/serial: RS485 bindings for device tree Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:02:38 +0200 Message-ID: <4E9581DE.20702@atmel.com> References: <1318353208-24422-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> <4E947CA6.9010703@atmel.com> <3289709.mzRgbAUyPT@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3289709.mzRgbAUyPT@wuerfel> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: jesper.nilsson@axis.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, claudio@evidence.eu.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 10/11/2011 08:41 PM, Arnd Bergmann : > On Tuesday 11 October 2011 19:28:06 Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> >>> +Optional properties: >>> +- linux,rs485-enabled-at-boot-time: empty property telling to enable the rs485 >>> + feature at boot time. It can be disabled later with proper ioctl. >> >> +- linux,rs485-rx-during-tx: empty property that enable the receiving of data >> + even whilst sending data. > > This does not sound too linux specific. If it's a hardware property, don't > use the 'linux,' prefix and just make it 'rs484-full-duplex' or such. Ok, I understand. Your remark may also apply to linux,rs485-rts-delay. So we may end-up with: - linux,rs485-enabled-at-boot-time - rs485-rx-during-tx - rs485-rts-delay Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre