From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Ferre Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] dmaengine: Device Tree support for Atmel DMA Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 16:30:23 +0200 Message-ID: <4EA424FF.50103@atmel.com> References: <1318438634-11826-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> <4E9C258D.3030509@atmel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4E9C258D.3030509@atmel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: vinod.koul@intel.com Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 10/17/2011 02:54 PM, Nicolas Ferre : > On 10/12/2011 06:57 PM, Nicolas Ferre : >> This series add the device tree support to Atmel DMA controller driver: >> at_hdmac. >> The removal of platform data ease the conversion to device tree. It also have >> the additional benefit of being simpler and cleaner. >> >> Nicolas Ferre (4): >> dmaengine: at_hdmac: platform data move to use .id_table >> dmaengine: at_hdmac: add device tree support >> ARM: at91/dma: remove platform data from DMA controller >> ARM: at91/dma: DMA controller registering with DT support >> >> .../devicetree/bindings/dma/atmel-dma.txt | 14 ++++ >> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45_devices.c | 17 ++--- >> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9rl_devices.c | 8 +-- >> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at_hdmac.h | 10 --- >> drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++--- >> drivers/dma/at_hdmac_regs.h | 8 ++ >> 6 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/atmel-dma.txt > > Vinod, > > I have just rebased the dmaengine at_hdmac driver patches on top of your > "next" branch as a "v4" series. I send it to you with Grant's "Acked-by" > right now. Vinod, Ping? Do you want me to provide you a git tree for those two patches? Do you think it can make it for 3.2 merge window? Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre